DivingPreacher- wasn't referring to your post but to dlndavid's.
Dr. Bill
Dr. Bill
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
drbill:DivingPreacher- wasn't referring to your post but to dlndavid's.
Dr. Bill
TheDivingPreacher:I find THAT pretty scary Bill. There may or may not be a problem, We may or may not be the cause, better throw 500,000,000,000 at the situation and feel better about it.
I think that is pretty illogical.
TheDivingPreacher:One primary reason
The primary reluctance to treaties like Kyoto, is that while they cost untold billions, there is no scientific evidence that a full implementation will affect global temps at all. The best estimates are that a full implementation MIGHT effect a change of a fraction of one degree.
Anybody interested can write a check to the UN to help fund this.
drbill:DivingPreacher- wasn't referring to your post but to dlndavid's.
Dr. Bill
TheDivingPreacher:One primary reason
No one has given or can give any solid evidence that humans are influencing the global climate. We do not need to argue whether or not the climate is changing. WE do not need to argue whether or not we are emitting greenhouse gasses. (regardless of the fact that the period of actual measurements and not estimated changes is extremely short)
The primary reluctance to treaties like Kyoto, is that while they cost untold billions, there is no scientific evidence that a full implementation will affect global temps at all. The best estimates are that a full implementation MIGHT effect a change of a fraction of one degree.
Anybody interested can write a check to the UN to help fund this.