Nitroxic
Registered
Masks with faceted lenses designed to allow a larger degree of visibility all seem to have an intrinsic problem. I was wondering what the manufactures take on it was:
The angle of the peripheral lens to the primary lenses is designed to create a nearly invisible seam between the two lenses. For example if you have the mask on, you look far to your left, you'll look first through the front lens, then through the side lens and hardly notice the seam. This works fantastic, however only out of the water. Once you take the mask underwater, because light travels at a different speed through water than air, the refractive properties of the mask changes so that the transition from the main piece of lens glass to the side glass is no longer seamless. There is a jump or break in objects, similar to a drinking straw in a glass of water.
Couldn't the mask be designed so that the angle of the side lenses to the main lens is corrected to the refractive properties of water to air rather than air to air?
Is this done intentionally to sell masks, since most people will try them on in a shop, and buy them based on a dry fit and not take them underwater?
I hope this makes sense.
I'm willing to sell the idea if anyone is interested. Free gear for life might do it.
The angle of the peripheral lens to the primary lenses is designed to create a nearly invisible seam between the two lenses. For example if you have the mask on, you look far to your left, you'll look first through the front lens, then through the side lens and hardly notice the seam. This works fantastic, however only out of the water. Once you take the mask underwater, because light travels at a different speed through water than air, the refractive properties of the mask changes so that the transition from the main piece of lens glass to the side glass is no longer seamless. There is a jump or break in objects, similar to a drinking straw in a glass of water.
Couldn't the mask be designed so that the angle of the side lenses to the main lens is corrected to the refractive properties of water to air rather than air to air?
Is this done intentionally to sell masks, since most people will try them on in a shop, and buy them based on a dry fit and not take them underwater?
I hope this makes sense.
I'm willing to sell the idea if anyone is interested. Free gear for life might do it.

Last edited: