....(but it's amazing how light rocks are underwater, she says, having tried this).....
.
Pffftt, that's just because you are a SuperDiveHero in disguise .....
Best Regards
Richard
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
....(but it's amazing how light rocks are underwater, she says, having tried this).....
.
Pffftt, that's just because you are a SuperDiveHero in disguise .....
One question that might be posed is why are we wearing so much weight that it is an issue? Developing good buoyancy techniques and being comfortable in the water should reduce your weight requirements, ideally to single digits or less, so the difference in having or not having your weight belt/pouch/whatever would be not such a potentially dangerous thing.
If you are where you can pick up rocks, they can help a little (but it's amazing how light rocks are underwater, she says, having tried this).
You need what you need. If you're 300 pounds of buoyant fat in a 7mm wetsuit, you're going to need some lead, notwithstanding the benefits of comfort and good technique. But it doesn't all have to be on your weightbelt. A backplate, heavier tank, or a weight-integrated bc allows you to divide your weight into ditchable and non-ditchable components. So you can still have ditchable weight in case of an emergency on the surface, but not have so much that losing it at depth is catastrophic.One question that might be posed is why are we wearing so much weight that it is an issue? Developing good buoyancy techniques and being comfortable in the water should reduce your weight requirements, ideally to single digits or less, so the difference in having or not having your weight belt/pouch/whatever would be not such a potentially dangerous thing.