First off I would like to acknowledge that I am new to diving and recently certified. While this means that I dont have much experience, but it also means that I have an open mind and have yet to develop too many bad habits.
I have listen to many points of few and based on them believe that diving with an air integrated computer makes diving inherently safer. Why is it safer? The probability of human error is greatly reduced, changes to the dive profile are updated in near real-time, and while they should not be relied upon alarms provide a backup warning. Additionally, after the dive the information, including theoretical nitrogen loading can be analyzed to see what you can improve.
However, this is a point of great debate. On one extreme are divers that maintains computers are unreliable, the scourge of the dive industry or at best, a cute novelty. On the other extreme are the divers that feel that dive computers are the best thing to happen to diving since the invention of SCUBA, and they make diving inherently safer.
What concerns me is that lack of impartial, objective information upon which to base an informed decision. Many experienced divers from who I have learned invaluable lessons appear to have an illogical bias on this issue.
On many occasions this issue is misrepresented, as computers versus tables and tables never fail. I would like to point out that without an SPG, bottom timer, and depth gauge a table is meaningless on a dive. So the real comparison is between computers versus a table, SPG, bottom timer, and depth gauge.
My approach is this:
The backup to my computer is my buddys, follow the more conservative.
If either computer fails the dive is over surface safely using the other computer.
If I decide to go into a situation where the dive cannot end easily and safely because of a computer failure, I should have a redundant computer, if I cant afford one I should pick a less expensive hobby or stick to recreational diving.
If anyone has a logical, objective reason why computers are not safer please let me know. Some of the reasons I heard that do not make sense are:
The battery died. Perform proper maintenance, change the battery, carry a spare, if necessary use redundant computers.
The computer might hit a rock and break. So might the SPG, depth gauge, or bottom timer, whats the difference?
Once again if anyone has a logical reason why computers are not safe please post it. What makes this board fun is the exchange of differences of opinion. If you feel inclined to hurl insults please buffer them with exceptional wit.
Thanks,
Mike
I have listen to many points of few and based on them believe that diving with an air integrated computer makes diving inherently safer. Why is it safer? The probability of human error is greatly reduced, changes to the dive profile are updated in near real-time, and while they should not be relied upon alarms provide a backup warning. Additionally, after the dive the information, including theoretical nitrogen loading can be analyzed to see what you can improve.
However, this is a point of great debate. On one extreme are divers that maintains computers are unreliable, the scourge of the dive industry or at best, a cute novelty. On the other extreme are the divers that feel that dive computers are the best thing to happen to diving since the invention of SCUBA, and they make diving inherently safer.
What concerns me is that lack of impartial, objective information upon which to base an informed decision. Many experienced divers from who I have learned invaluable lessons appear to have an illogical bias on this issue.
On many occasions this issue is misrepresented, as computers versus tables and tables never fail. I would like to point out that without an SPG, bottom timer, and depth gauge a table is meaningless on a dive. So the real comparison is between computers versus a table, SPG, bottom timer, and depth gauge.
My approach is this:
The backup to my computer is my buddys, follow the more conservative.
If either computer fails the dive is over surface safely using the other computer.
If I decide to go into a situation where the dive cannot end easily and safely because of a computer failure, I should have a redundant computer, if I cant afford one I should pick a less expensive hobby or stick to recreational diving.
If anyone has a logical, objective reason why computers are not safer please let me know. Some of the reasons I heard that do not make sense are:
The battery died. Perform proper maintenance, change the battery, carry a spare, if necessary use redundant computers.
The computer might hit a rock and break. So might the SPG, depth gauge, or bottom timer, whats the difference?
Once again if anyone has a logical reason why computers are not safe please post it. What makes this board fun is the exchange of differences of opinion. If you feel inclined to hurl insults please buffer them with exceptional wit.
Thanks,
Mike