RockiesFan
Banned
I am of the opinion that diving as an activity should be allowed to age out. The environmental damage due to tourism in general is irreversible. Time to give the world's reefs a break.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I don't think things have changed so much. If anything, probably more young people try breathing underwater than 30 years ago. The simple fact is that most people don't value diving enough to put the effort and money into it. Taking a DIscover Scuba course is easy and lots of people do that. Diving enough to get good at it and being willing to carry a lot of gear on vacation is another level of dedication. Dedicating a room of your house to the gear is a level above that. Most just don't get enough enjoyment out of it to make the time and financial commitment to doing it. They instead enjoy doing one thing this trip and another thing the next trip. I think it has always been that way.I am sorry that I ever started this thread. I was hoping for an intelligent discussion about opportunities and ideas for attracting younger people to scuba diving, like the excellent suggestion by @Marie13 that some dives be geared toward newer and younger divers - in her case that includes shallow wreck dive trips in the Great Lakes.
Instead it has turned into a nasty exchange between older divers determined to gripe about "What's the matter with kids today!" and defensive younger divers who are justifiably angered by all the finger-pointing and negativity.
The thread has done the exact opposite of what I had hoped for; it is more likely to drive younger divers away then attract them to the sport of diving and I am very disappointed.
I am of the opinion that diving as an activity should be allowed to age out. The environmental damage due to tourism in general is irreversible. Time to give the world's reefs a break.
A non issue if divers are taught properly.I am of the opinion that diving as an activity should be allowed to age out. The environmental damage due to tourism in general is irreversible. Time to give the world's reefs a break.
Cost is a thing clearly, which got me thinking about budget oceanic diving options. In the U.S./Bahamas/Caribbean region, aside from shore diving in California, the main famous example is Blackbeards live-aboard cruises. They have somehow held the line at around a grand (plus tips and airfare, but booked in advance I think airfare to catch the boat can be pretty cheap?) and you can get 18-19 or so dives? Described as 'camping at sea,' little privacy, no nitrox, limited freshwater availability, but overall a great value and very popular. I've noticed someone mentioned haven't done it when younger, but it's not for them now that they're, um, a bit less young.
I wonder if this is a business model that ought to be propagated elsewhere. For land-based operations, more 'dive hostels.'
Morehead City, North Carolina has Olympus Dive Center, which had a dive lodge where one can stay quite cheaply. Utila is known for a 'backpacker culture.' Cozumel has some cheap options.
Anyone know how the cheap, basic businesses associated with diving are doing in the region?
As a fellow EE, I (think) that I detect a note of tongue-in-cheek sarcasm in your post. Your post bothered me for a while until I think that I 'got it'.I didn't read the full thread but just the subject title makes me cringe. Why do we need more people underwater?
...Maybe it'd be useful to compose websites profiling fairly low budget, high value trips and strive to get the word out...?