How "NOT" to take a shark's pic.

[Mike Veitch]

Good ad for Sea and Sea...

 

[Larry C]

Go back and read the Sharks! thread a few lines down. Apparently, Nacho and his pals have had about 12 of these for lunch. Something about the signals off the strobe, perhaps.

 

[PaulChristenson]

SHARK ATTACK...
It might get published by the CDNN...

 

[ch0ppersrule]

I would gladly give up my camera to a Tiger (or pretty much any shark that wanted it).

 

[Lonefox]

Were the photo's that the shark took any good ?

 

[Fish_Whisperer]

Wow... I wonder if that shark would have snapped better photos if he would have been outfitted in BP/W?

I wonder what would have happened if the shark hadn't latched onto the camera... *shudder*

 

[kapula]

I bet that sharks shoots only in RAW format

 

[Jamdiver]

This could be a good ad touting the durability of <insert company's name> housings .

"Our housings are individually tested by our trained tiger sharks:

:rofl2: :rofl2:

 

[caymaniac]

He probably found out how expensive those rigs are and decided he'd get one......real cheap, or maybe he was thinking about taking up underwater human photography.
Either way, did he give it back?

 

[Fish_Whisperer]

I bet that sharks shoots only in RAW format

:lol: