That's a Blue Steel marking, not a Faber marking.I believe that the OP should be able to look at the stamped marking on the tanks to determine the size. All 4 of my Faber LPs have BS85 or BS95 stamped on them.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
That's a Blue Steel marking, not a Faber marking.I believe that the OP should be able to look at the stamped marking on the tanks to determine the size. All 4 of my Faber LPs have BS85 or BS95 stamped on them.
I believe that the OP should be able to look at the stamped marking on the tanks to determine the size. All 4 of my Faber LPs have BS85 or BS95 stamped on them.
Tursiops is correct. Those would be Blue Steel markings for tank size. If your tanks were not sold by Blue Steel, those markings would be absent. My bad.Where should I look for the stamp? Did you see the pics I took of the tanks?
Dropbox - tank pics - Simplify your life
No..the stated volume is 75.8 at 2640 (with the +).
Fuzzy pic taken with a potato lense, but its there..tank is narrow though.
View attachment 541611
How is that relevant? Are tanks only filled to the service pressure correctly if they are stamped in metric units now? Do you get a better fill if you use the real SI unit for pressure of megapascals?
If euro tanks were sold as 2500 liters, 3000 liters, etc then it would be a direct comparison to CF ratings. the liter ratings are just as unreliable as CF because you fail to account for compressibility still.
No, it' isn't. It's surface gas volume.cubic feet is a direct representation of stored gas volume
I've showed you mine, what about you showing me yours?doing the calculation for 0.5 cf/min is not that much harder than your 15 liters.
Are you saying the amount of gas in the tank changes if I take the tank to depth?No, it' isn't. It's surface gas volume.