Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Not quite a bp/w with a soft travel pack instead of a backplate.
True. Makes it not much different from any other bp/w set up. Realistically, there aren't huge differences between a lot of them.Not quite a bp/w with a soft travel pack instead of a backplate.
I have the HOG TBCS 32# wing softpack. It is very well made, and extremely comfortable in and out of the water. I bought it to replace a Zeagle Covert, which is also a great travel bc and does weigh less than the HOG. By comparison, I surprisingly, I found the buoyancy to be very similar despite the HOG shoulder, waist, and back padding looking like it should make the bc much more buoyant. Both were about 2.5-3# positively buoyant in fresh water. The HOG is heavier, but that is expected because the shoulder, and waist straps are far more substantial, the D rings and waist buckle are metal instead of plastic, and it has a lot more D rings and attachment points. Because of the donut shaped bladder on the HOG, I found my trim to be better, with less weight needed on the cam bands to keep my feet from dropping below the lateral plane. Total lead weight required for neutral buoyancy was nearly identical. I tried the HOG softpack with and without the addition of a SS STA, and liked the stability of the tank better without the STA. Tank stability was far superior than on my Covert and is important to me for the type of local volunteer diving I do. Of course, you can get the HOG with a SS or Aluminum bp instead of the softpack if that is your preference, and likely would have chosen that option if I did not require air travel for most of my salt water diving. I hope this short review is helpful.