JeffG
Contributor
Yea...but the truth never stopped the Lawman from trollingdiverbrian:Actually, you had my old recreational dive buddy on the last Toby trip where I met you. He said that you did great on the last day that you were there.

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Yea...but the truth never stopped the Lawman from trollingdiverbrian:Actually, you had my old recreational dive buddy on the last Toby trip where I met you. He said that you did great on the last day that you were there.
While it is true that with more input data (experience) you will have a more accurate assessment of SAC rate. This of course leaves student diver or a new diver with little information to work with, but, does it mean they shouldn't work with what they have?FatCat:You can apply any which formula you want, you'll still need past dive data to work with.
So, a new diver will have to guess, based on the few dives he or she has already done. Don't expect a very accurate estimate though. Which is why a new diver should restrict himself to dives well within the NDL and with the option of a direct ascent until said diver has enough data to work with.
jbd:While it is true that with more input data (experience) you will have a more accurate assessment of SAC rate. This of course leaves student diver or a new diver with little information to work with, but, does it mean they shouldn't work with what they have?
In my OW courses I required a minimum of five scuba dives for certification. If the students calculate their SAC rate for each dive, they begin to get a feel for doing the calculations and they get an idea of what their SAC rate is. As they progress through the dives you can ask them to plan a deeper dive and see if the air suppply they are going to use will provide them enough air to dive the planned profile. By doing this during their training they begin to realize that the AL 80 that only lasts them 20 minutes at 30 feet isn't really going to do much for them on a 90 foot dive in Coz while they are on vacation. Better to put off the vacation to Coz until they have gained some experience and improved their SAC rate.
This lets the new diveer make informed decisions about their diving instead of just going along with the crowd and either cutting the dive short safely or in few cases I know of personnally completely running out of air around 100 feet down.
IMO rough knowledge is better than no knowledge.
It might not be the omega, but it's certainly the alpha.FatCat:The last is true.
But air consumption at depth is not a linear extrapolation of SAC. There are too many variables involved.
IMO, gauge monitoring - ie. gas managment - is a better option for new divers. They can compare this to SAC calculation for all I care, but as you so aptly stated: a rule of thumb is a rule of thumb, nothing more.
Those who think that SAC calcs are the alfa and omega of gas planning should rethink.
pilot fish:This brings me to the nagging question, what happens if you and this Hoover are the odd man on the boat and you don't want to dive with him? What if DM insists, as happened to me in Coz a few years ago? How do you get out of it if he is all there is and you are not trained or have the proper equipment to solo dive?
And how do you get your Rock Bottom?JimC:SAC/RVM tell me if I have enough gas to bother getting on the boat. It estimates how long my gas supply should last but is essentialy usless once the dive starts.
Rock bottom tells me when I need to head back and is the gas management number I need in the water.
Both are (essential) parts of dive planing, both are completely separate items that have nothing to do with one and other.
jonnythan:And how do you get your Rock Bottom?