Snowbear:
:11: WOW :11:
Now there'sSo - what would you propose these folks do to prevent what occurred in Don's story?
The first step is proper training. My buddies and I have been trained, and train our students, that problems that occur under water get fixed under water.
I've also made sure that I can reach my valves, whether in doubles or singles. My buddies can all do the same and, once again, we train our students to do the same. If they can't reach their valves, they are told to work on it until they can. That's one reason why we don't train people to wear their tanks dangling off their butts.
Some actual buddy skills and situational awareness might be worth considering. Buddies need to know what is going with each other and be prepared to assist. They must stay close enough to each other that they can react to a problem and be prepared to take charge of a situation to prevent an incident from becoming accident. They do not allow a buddy to blow and go.
The second step is proper planning. During our head to toe pre-dive check and brief, which is conducted before every dive, we go over every piece of equipment from head to toe. Part of that check includes a flow check, whcih means that we reach back and manipulate the valves to make sure that (1) we can reach them; and (2) they are on. The flow check is followed by breathing off the primary and backup regs while watching the SPG. There are no exceptions to this rule.
The third step is a global rule. The crews on the boats that I use regularly are smart enough to not touch equipment unless asked, i.e., handing me a stage bottle and helping me clip it off. They do NOT manipulate valves or babysit divers by messing with their gear in the interest of "helping".
If I'm on a new boat, I make it very clear that I don't want them to touch my equipment under any circumstances or for any reason. I'm polite, but very clear and emphatic.
It goes without saying the my buddies and I don't touch each other's equipment.
None of this is rocket science. Accordingly, compare what would have happened if the divers in question had performed ANY of these simple checks.
I'd also echo the statements about the type of dive that was being performed. There is simply no way that you can convince me that executing a 140 foot dive on air or nitrox in a single tank is appropriate, particularly when done by a diver who reacts to emergencies in the manner described above. That's beyond asinine.
In the end, it comes down to taking personal responsibility for your own safety and equipment, rather then being an underwater tourist who depends on third parties to ensure your safety and who can't handle a reasonably simple and entirely preventable accident.