mattia_v
Contributor
OP: nice shots! I find over/unders a pain with the RX100, have a new (bigger) wet lens with dome now so I may manage to get a few better ones next time around.
Not my shots, but I'll chime in and say that the RX100 mk I housing from Acquapazza is a joy to use, and essentially identical. It's solid, double O-ring, small, lightweight (good for travel), and plenty of places to attach arms/trays/balls/lights/whatever. I shoot mine without a tray and extra handle, just ball and joint arms (5"+ 8" ULCS) attached to the top, with some floats to balance the rig and lens holders for the macro/WA glass. Travels well, shoots well, great quality. Value is tough to beat, IMO.
How do you like the acquapazza housing?
Not my shots, but I'll chime in and say that the RX100 mk I housing from Acquapazza is a joy to use, and essentially identical. It's solid, double O-ring, small, lightweight (good for travel), and plenty of places to attach arms/trays/balls/lights/whatever. I shoot mine without a tray and extra handle, just ball and joint arms (5"+ 8" ULCS) attached to the top, with some floats to balance the rig and lens holders for the macro/WA glass. Travels well, shoots well, great quality. Value is tough to beat, IMO.