3dent:
In summary, the actual Spare Air is a 3 cu ft tank that will not get you to the surface from more than about 50 ft. and forget about a safety stop.
In case noone's seen it;
The Spare Air and Odyssey were reviewed and tested in this article at ScubaDiving.com,
http://www.scubadiving.com/gear/regulators/bailout_bottles/0/
In it, they acted semi-panicked and rose no faster than their safe ascent rates. They said the spare air got them to the surface from 70' with a little extra left.
The smaller (original) spare air worked from 45 ft. And the Odyssey, from the full 132' (max rec depth).
Now, I've only been diving a little more than a year, but I have yet to see doubles OR a pony. Just buddies on dive boats with octos, going down to around 100' or less.
In these instances, having that spare air, as an added measure of safety sounds like a great idea to me. Whether it was for calmly reaching your buddy in time, or for an emergency ascent, I'd rather have SOME air than NO air. Recovering from DCS at the surface is a HELLUVALOT better than drowning at depth.
Sure, the pony would be even better, but the individual is going to have to weigh the additional cost, weight, setup and maintenance vs. the ease of slapping a bail-out bottle on their BC and jumping in. If I were diving deeper than 100', or penetrating wrecks/caves, I'm sure I'd practically be REQUIRED to carry a pony or double. And I'd have no problem with that. But considering MOST divers I've seen average 60' depths & don't carry ANYTHING but an octo,.. having Spare Air cans would be a considerable improvement, IMHO. Even if it's just to give them a few breaths' time to calm down and think & then act.
This may have been reported before, but hey, that's what public forums are for right? Endlessly rehashing the same old crap, spewing opinion after opinion?
Besides... I've never had to use a bail-out bottle yet, so technically I shouldn't be posting here anyways. But even though the original poster has already made his decision, I thought I'd point to an article where testers HAD used them and DID test their performance.
(grumble, I wish the makers of spare air would be upfront enough to post these, or their own, test results on their website vs. posting how many "surface breaths" it has.)