runsongas
Contributor
As long as you asked, IMO the much maligned back mounted independent doubles are the way to go. Here's why IMO:
ID's are more practical than SM for OW diving from shore or a boat. A personal preference mostly but I was more comfortable with BM, having tried SM with factory reps on several occasions.
If you dive BM now there isn't much to learn as opposed to SM. LDS and instructors don't like this part.
ID's do not require the large $$$ lay out that SM does. Depending how much gear a diver has accumulated ID's could have a very low start up cost. The LDS don't like this part.
ID's provide the diver with 2 independent bottles, built in redundancy no pony bottle required.
ID's are easy to handle on land because out of the bands they are of course singles.
ID's provides the diver with single tank use without owning many tanks and the cost that entails. (Hydros, VIPS. O2 cleaning.)
ID's eliminate the need for a manifold although not likely to fail, a possible failure point none the less, if for nothing else than O-rings. Divers with restricted shoulder mobility can appreciate this, I know I do.
A major downside is that the diver could be restricted to access to only 1 tank if a catastrophic failure occurs on the other tank. Attention to air management is required especially the last half of the dive keeping in mind that both tanks should not be drained past the point of providing enough gas for a safe return to the surface.
Good luck
I disagree that ID bottles are better than sidemount. you can leave them on while climbing boat ladders with safety clips. for six pack rhibs, unclip in the water, a lot of people doff the bcd when climbing back on a rhib in BM anyways. trying SM a few times is not enough to build proficiency yet, same as trying a drysuit for a few dives will not make you comfortable enough in it yet compared to a wetsuit.
SM costs about the same as the standard BM configuration. you have one extra spg and a left hand valve, but you don't need tank bands. a SM bladder is close to the cost of a doubles wing and the harness is fairly inexpensive if you put one together yourself.
SM is also redundant, easy to handle on land, and they can be used as single tanks too. SM is significantly easier to reach for valve drills or feathering compared to backmount doubles. depending on the valves used, ID can be harder to reach than a doubles manifold.