Geneva "Memory Dive" Study

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

lowwall

Contributor
Messages
4,659
Reaction score
6,875
Location
Chicago
# of dives
200 - 499
I searched the forums, but couldn't find any references to the following study (full text available in pdf http://dmnu-pet5.hcuge.ch/pdf/BJSM2004.pdf and html http://bjsm.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/38/2/108)

Negative neurofunctional effects of frequency, depth and environment in recreational scuba diving: the Geneva "memory dive" study.

D O Slosman1, S de Ribaupierre1, C Chicherio1,2, C Ludwig1,2, M-L Montandon1, M Allaoua1, L Genton1,3, C Pichard3, A Grousset4, E Mayer5, J-M Annoni5 and A de Ribaupierre2

Objectives: To explore relationships between scuba diving activity, brain, and behaviour, and more specifically between global cerebral blood flow (CBF) or cognitive performance and total, annual, or last 6 months’ frequencies, for standard dives or dives performed below 40 m, in cold water or warm sea geographical environments.

Methods: A prospective cohort study was used to examine divers from diving clubs around Lac Léman and Geneva University Hospital. The subjects were 215 healthy recreational divers (diving with self-contained underwater breathing apparatus). Main outcome measures were: measurement of global CBF by 133Xe SPECT (single photon emission computed tomography); psychometric and neuropsychological tests to assess perceptual-motor abilities, spatial discrimination, attentional resources, executive functioning, and memory; evaluation of scuba diving activity by questionnaire focusing on number and maximum depth of dives and geographical site of the diving activity (cold water v warm water); and body composition analyses (BMI).

Results: (1) A negative influence of depth of dives on CBF and its combined effect with BMI and age was found. (2) A specific diving environment (more than 80% of dives in lakes) had a negative effect on CBF. (3) Depth and number of dives had a negative influence on cognitive performance (speed, flexibility and inhibition processing in attentional tasks). (4) A negative effect of a specific diving environment on cognitive performance (flexibility and inhibition components) was found.

Conclusions: Scuba diving may have long-term negative neurofunctional effects when performed in extreme conditions, namely cold water, with more than 100 dives per year, and maximal depth below 40 m.


From the Discussion:

To our knowledge, the present study represents the first attempt to study long-term neurological effects in recreational scuba divers in a large sample of over 200 subjects by using a wide range of psychometric tests and objective quantitative parameters of global cerebral blood flow. It leads us to conclude that, apart from standard recreational diving which remains safe when performed in warm seas and at depths above 40 m, the combination of depth (below 40 m) and cold water diving appears to be associated with long-term neurological effects in active divers. Therefore this type of scuba diving should no longer be considered recreational scuba diving, but more rather an "extreme sport", for which specific medical advice should be considered. However, the residual risk can be lowered with increased control measures and appropriate risk assessment. A longitudinal follow-up study will be conducted to confirm these observations and warn the fast growing recreational scuba diving community against risks associated with regular deep dives in cold water.

As this was not a longitudinal study, there's an obvious correlation/causation question, i.e. instead of concluding that deep, cold water makes you stupid, they could have concluded that smart people seek out warm and shallow water :05:. The authors do note they are planning a follow-up which should help answer this.

I posted this here because of of their hypothesis (more of a speculation really) that "Overall, for an identical dive profile, diving in cold water may result in an increased nitrogen saturation state. In addition, knowing that the temperature of exhaled air is decreased, one may hypothesize that the blood wash-out of nitrogen may be lowered and therefore the increased tissue residence time of nitrogen could be associated with an increased risk of tissue alteration by local development of microbubbles, particularly in very sensitive tissue such as cerebral tissue."

Alex
 
lowwall:
"...Overall, for an identical dive profile, diving in cold water may result in an increased nitrogen saturation state. In addition, knowing that the temperature of exhaled air is decreased, one may hypothesize that the blood wash-out of nitrogen may be lowered and therefore the increased tissue residence time of nitrogen could be associated with an increased risk of tissue alteration by local development of microbubbles, particularly in very sensitive tissue such as cerebral tissue."

Is it that most cold water divers freeze their butts off because they don't wear enough exposure protection, or do they wear enough but still experience increased effects from nitrogen? I presume the inhaled gas is colder because the tanks are colder, but would that cause the problem. (I've only done warm water diving).
 
DUHHH... what? I'm cold. Let's go diving! :D
 
Interesting stuff.

It's interesting that they conclude that the differences are related to cold when there are enormous differences in the frequency of diving and the types of profiles shown in the anthropometric data. It looks like the differences could just as easily be related to deep diving in and of itself than to the temperature of the water.

Also, the lake divers were showing much more frequent diving, more than twice the number of life time dives and much shorter times after their last dive (or deep dives) before being tested. It would be interesting to see a series of tests done over time to estabilish variance and decay of the effect, if any...

I think to establish if it was really the cold that you'd have to have a much larger sample and compare a cross section of divers who made similar profiles over a similar period of time. As it is, this only looks like it's showing us that there is some kind of effect that could be related to cold, depth, frequency of diving, total number of life-time dives, possibly the type of inspired gas (which doesn't look like it was considered at all), total exposure times, or a range of other factors that they weren't even tracking.... unless, of course, other studies have already ruled out these things.

Take home message: Something is happening but saying that it's the cold is jumping to conclusions.

R..
 

Back
Top Bottom