I'm not saying you're wrong about some people feeling this way, but I think that associating a lack of safety with adventure is somewhat of a non-sequitor.
Not me, it was DEMA, back in the early 80's or so.
is it more adventerous to go with the unsafe operation?
I don't think they were talking about that. It was more the "felt perception" that you were about to be on the thin edge. This perception can be cultivated by laying off of the continued hammering on the safety issue, and concentrating istead on the adventure aspect.
I think this was the first appearance of the diver logo image that portrayed him carrying a lit magnesium flare. What says adventure more than that? It might have been anachronistic, but it worked. It has since evolved into a "torch of knowledge" look.
Anyways, for the topic as a whole, I've actually heard the opposite in a business class. I forget who it was, some business PHD somewhere I think, claimed that the popularity of something has to do with current age and is actually very consistent generation to generation.
Those who can not do, teach... :doctor: Those who cannot teach, administrate.
This is a very simplistic approach that held that the economy was growing, or static at worst. Surprise! It was blind to what has become the now rapidly changing and shrinking economy.
The potential market for new divers has shrunk dramatically. From the early 80's, the amount of discretionary dollars has shrunk comparatively to zero.
Diving is not cheap, certainly when done more than once in a year!
And I suspect scuba suffers from this somewhat: this large group is hitting retirement age. From general observations, it seems every generation has their vacation divers, divers who will only dive warm water, divers willing to dive in any conditions, and divers who want to go technical.
I believe that the industry is going to concentrate on that "vacation bound" market, the honeymoon, the young couples and adventure singles. There aren't many people who are 18~35 who can afford this frivolity, certainly not if they are in breeding mode.
The effect has been seen in the skiing market. The cross-country (nordic) style was a flash in the pan, and downhill (alpine) is suffering terribly, most obviously at the destination resorts (Colorado, Utah, Canadian Rockies). The effect is slightly less profound than that of scuba, as most ski travel is within North America (no fear of foreign travel, no dollar disparity, excessive air fares) and there are "newly acceptable" lower level local resorts (Michigan, Vermont, etc).
Disneyworld people are now showing up at 6 Flags.
The effect of the economy on the market has been profound. Divers, as a group, are getting noticeably (and statistically) older. They have a few buck left over after the kids went away and stayed away.