FYI -- here were my observations on the Panasonic FX9 vs. Fuji F10
After doing my homework on a ultra/semiultra compact DC, I settled on 3 models to get my hands on:
* Panasonic Lumix FX9
* Fuji F10
* Nikon S4
My priorities were:
1. Compactness and ergonomics (useability and physical)
2. Optical Zoom and ability to stabilize
3. Low light sensitivity
4. Availability of H20 housing
5. Speed
I've been testing the Panasonic and the Fuji for the past two weeks and really wish there was a clear winner, but they seem to both excel in mutually exclusive areas. (Nikon was back ordered) I am hoping that actual owners can validate my findings. I'd love to find out, for instance, that some of the cons I've found can be addressed by correctly setting features, etc.
So here's what I've found:
Panasonic Pro's:
* 4x zoom in certain resolutions that I find makes a big difference vs. 3x
* Size and "sexiness" -- I love the feel of this camera in my hand
* Excellent fast photo capabilities (3 fps, unlimited)
* Image stabilization really works
* Screen pixel resolution (I preview and share many photos directly from cam)
* Compact battery charger
* Great menus and ease of changing settings quickly
Panasonic Con's:
* No waterproof housing known (please, someone tell me there is one or plans for one, as this would be the deal closer)
* Simply cannot focus lock on some objects in low light conditions like the F10 can
* Short batt life (compared to F10)
* Zooming up from 1x-3x is a little slow
Fuji Pro's:
* Low light performance is astounding. I spent a lot of time doing side by side comparisons of the two and the F10 blows away the FX9 when using the same ISO. See the comparison photo's I've attached
* Battery life. Unbelievable. I've charged it once and have shot probably 600 shots and it's still 2/3 full
* H20 stock case
* Continuous focus feature allows faster non-prefocused shutter time
* Not really a pro, but although the Fuji does not have image stab, I did not notice this to be an issue in most of the photos I took
Fuji Con's:
* Physical design is undistinguished -- feels blocky and chunky next to the svelte and rounded Panasonic
* Menus suck compared to the Panasonic and often require more steps
* High speed action shot capabilities only capture 1st or last 3 frames -- the infinite continuous only captures at 1/sec. Have I got this wrong, or is there a way to capture more than 3 at the 3fps speed?
* Flash doesn't seem to fill as well as the Panasonic. Hard to explain, but if I'm taking indoor photos, the Panasonic does a better job "filling" the space between the subject and camera if there are intermediate objects around.
* Playback zoom is limited at all except the highest resolutions (very annoying)
* Really stupid cord system (what were they thinking?) (although this is mitigated by the length of the battery life and if I get a xD card reader)
* Cost of xD proprietary memory (though this also contributes to the speed and low battery drain)