Fresh ammo for the bp/wings debate

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Allen42 once bubbled...
Walter, in his initial review of the article (I can't open the article itself):

"Not all divers, however, are big fans of back-inflate style BC's. These are notorious for pushing the diver "face forward" at the surface, and therefore are not favored by many divers who spend a lot of time at the surface, such as instructors, students, or boat divers.”

Any healthy diver can rest comfortably in a supine position while on the surface in a back inflate BC. To counteract this problem in both of these styles of BC, many of today's manufacturers are selling their BC's with "trim pockets" placed behind the diver and on either side of the tank.”

This is another example of trying to change gear to compensate for poor training."



And then Northeastwrecks:

"Perhaps you could show us how to use trim weights to compensate for poor skills." and as an insult later "Just make sure that you bring your trim weights."
Oh...In the thread and not the Article. I was looking in the wrong place.:)

Theres nothing wrong with trim weights. IMO I don't believe it is "gear" to compensate for poor training. Trim weights are more to compensate for different body types/center of gravity.

Jeff
 
A few posts back, we talked about the fact that I'd moved the article to a new server... And gave the address for it. Unfortunately, I think that was a little short-sighted on my part... People seeing this thread for the first time certainly will click on the first link they see, not the one some nine pages later.

Sorry 'bout that, y'all...

So instead, I've placed the article back where it was originally... Actually, it was a simpler solution than that - a page which automatically refreshes to the correct place on the web to see the article.

In short, what that means is that everyone should be able to see the article from here on, no matter which link is used.

Just for kicks, here's the address again:

http://www.bftwave.net/lcscuba/homebc.html

Sorry if I gave the impression that there was something "wrong" with trim weights. Frankly, I can see how some divers would consider trim weights a "solution looking for a problem," or "manufacturers compensating for poor skills." However, the bottom line is that no matter who you are or how you dive, if your gear is out of perfect balance (what are the chances that it's "nailed" perfectly out of the box for your body type?) then there is no "skill" which is going to enable you to keep proper position without sculling with your hands or feet. For some divers, they don't mind "sculling." Others, particularly cavers and wreckers and other people concerned about too much motion (and the likelihood of causing a siltout because of it), prefer to have a very balanced rig underwater. The diver who is constantly sculling also expends more energy than the diver who's balanced and simply hovers there... And therefore uses much more air (effectively reducing the diver's SAC and decreasing the amount of dive time).

To some, it might not be a big deal. To others, not having to scull to keep position is a very big deal. Again, it really boils down to your dive style.

If someone were to ask me (and nobody did) then I would say that I prefer to dive a balanced rig. Not everyone agrees; even more people don't really care all that much, unless it's horribly out of whack.

But trim weights are an excellent way to "balance" your rig, and I tried to convey in the article that they were an improvement over BC's not equipped with the pockets.

All of that said, those divers who feel that "trim pockets are the manufacturer's way of compensating for poor skills" generally feel this way not because they don't want a balanced rig - but because they balance their rigs using other methods. They use single tank adapters, V-weights, P-weights, weight belt placement, trim weights, and even backplates weighing different amounts. They still go through the process of balancing themselves underwater, just like everyone else. In fact, many of them even utilize different tanks of different sizes and weights to balance themselves underwater; that's often why they make such a big deal about what "sort" of tank they use.

The "skill" that they speak of is really an aquired understanding of what combination of the above works such that they end up balanced and do not have to utilize trim weights. After all, doesn't it make more sense to reduce the amount of "stuff" on the diver's rig (especially buoyant "stuff," like aluminum tanks) than simply add more weights and more pockets and more stitching and more buckles and more places to get things snagged on?

...So in a way, the additional "skill" is there, although it's more of an "aquired experience" thing than an actual dive skill. But for many people, especially the inexperienced diver, the simple use of trim weights is also an excellent method of balancing oneself in the water. It far beats not trimming oneself at all.

Being a diver who's quite sold on a backplate and wing, I feel it's yet another advantage of that sort of rig - you never need to use trim weights. The backplate, which is practically indestructable, relatively inexpensive, and highly stable underwater reduces the need for trim weights, and may remove the need completely if you choose the right plate. (The bottomost example in the article shows that situation in action.) They are available inexpensively in a variety of materials and weights, the standard length six-pounder being what most people are comfortable with.

The bottom line is that trimming oneself underwater - a skill not taught to most divers in open water or advanced open water classes - can vastly increase the amount of enjoyment a diver gets out of the sport. In fact, in some cases, perfect trim and buoyancy (the marked skill of most cave divers and wreck divers) can mean the difference between a safe dive and a not-so-safe dive.

How you go about learning and adjusting perfect trim is really up to you.
 
Hi everyone!

Since I'm thinking about buying a BC within the next few months I stated looking for recommendations and pros and cons for the different BC styles.
After reading for about 2 hours in this thread and looking at other sites/opinions as well I'm a bit confused.


Some background info about my person (maybe makes it easier for you to give some tips if you like :) ) :

I've made about 40 dives since last year in both fresh and sea water, using various rented jacket-style BCs.
For the future I plan to dive wrecks and caves, do some underwater photography, maybe deep dive.
I'll not be diving 24/7 and I don't like water temperatures below 10 deg celsius.


The bottom line from all of my research is: None of the 3 styles (wing, jacket, backinflate) can claim to be the best. Try out which suits you most!

However, this can prove difficult for a newbie. Where can she/he rent a wing/BC or a backinf.? I have never seen one of these on the boats.

This is my personal list of facts (correct me if I'm terribly wrong with something):

Pros Wing:
- best value vs. price relation
- more flexible (get different wings with different amount of lift but keep plate; more easy to switch between 1 or 2 tanks)
- risk of squeezing your chest is very low, also for beginners
- light weighted
- more streamlined under water

Cons Wing:
- Takes more time to setup (one test mentioned a 'falling apart when tank is disassembled' effect for some models)
- Trimming/getting used to it is more difficult


Pros Jacket:
- Most brands and models to choose from
- Very easy to assemble and to mount
- Very low cost models available

Cons Jacket:
- Can squeeze if fully inflated (a lot of beginners tend to put on too much weight and compensate this with the BC)
- Keeping balance/position when swimming sideways can be more difficult


Pros Back Inflated:
- Couldn't really find some which are only valid for this style

Cons Back Inflated:
- Can also give you some sort of constricting feeling if mounted wrong


Some questions I still have:
- Is there a difference in durability/longevity?
Maybe based on the materials used? My feeling is that this could be a disadvantage for Jacket style BCs.
- Is it more difficult to get spare parts for Wing BCs? Are repairs more expensive?
- I've read about 'annoying and silly' crotch straps for Wing BCs. But when I look at the Dive Rite Transtec and others I cannot find them. So what's that story?


Tell me what you think about my posting.

Jens
 
Well.. to be honest with you, I have been doing the whole backwing vs Jacket debate for some time.. and this is my thinking. If you plan on doing technical diving in the future then go with a Backplate. It is my observation that most people out there that do Wreck and Cave diving dive with BP/Wing. This means that it will be a lot easier to find help when you get into that type of stuff. If you plan on taking some DIR Courses then I think (not positive) that they STRONGLY recommend BP/Wing. Also, Unless your as lazy as me! :D You can find lots of information and help in trimming them.. especially on this board. Between you me and a Fence post, I own a SP Knighthawk(Back inflate), but I will be supplementing it with a BP/Wing (probably a FredT model) simply because of the options it allows for (Dual Tank, Cute Little Argon Bottle for Dry suit, bullet resistant harness, Centralized weight, and upgradeability with a Dewalt) :ninja:

Another interesting part is, You don't have to fork out all the cash at once.. You can buy the Backplate for 80-300, the wing for 100-500, the webbing for 10-200, etc.. it can be split up. Were as a nice quality BC will run you from 300-5,000 (Disclaimer: The prices are generalized and might be exaggerated)

Hope this helps....

Oh.. I could be wrong, however I think that most Penetration dives require some sort of spare air, either a Pony Bottle, or Twin tanks, or something.. you might try finding out what BC's like jacket inflates can support more then one tank, so you don't have to re-purchase if you go that route.
 
wb416 once bubbled...
??HOURS?? I could see maybe 5-10 minutes, but I think hours is a bit melodramatic.
Plus the fact that the same rig will fit anyone. No "S, M, ML, L, XL" BS going on. If I drop 30 pounds, I might have to get my TLS modified or buy a new one, but I won't have to replace my BC.
 
Pio once bubbled...

Where can she/he rent a wing/BC or a backinf.? I have never seen one of these on the boats.

That was a big problem for me as well. Bottom line: I just placed a lot of phone calls and did some driving to be able to find what I was looking for.

Interestingly, Halcyon (the favored bp/wing on this board) allows you to purchase their product and try it, risk-free for 30 days (liberal return policy). I don't know the specifics, so I recommend asking the salesperson about that. Extreme Exposure ( http://extreme-exposure.com ) can inform you of the specifics.


Pros Wing:
- best value vs. price relation
- more flexible (get different wings with different amount of lift but keep plate; more easy to switch between 1 or 2 tanks)
- risk of squeezing your chest is very low, also for beginners
- light weighted
- more streamlined under water

Cons Wing:
- Takes more time to setup (one test mentioned a 'falling apart when tank is disassembled' effect for some models)
- Trimming/getting used to it is more difficult

I agree. There are lots of models, however, that do not "fall apart when the tank is disassembled." Again, Halcyon makes quite a nice unit that doesn't do this.

There is some truth to the fact that since they're not as common as "regular" BC's, getting used to them can be a little intimidating. I will say, though, that for me, "getting used to it" took about two dives. It's different than a "regular" BC, but in good ways. Frankly, I didn't find it any more difficult to "get used to" than anything else I tried. Of course, it's still somewhat intimidating, since most people have never tried one before.

Bottom line: It seemed scarier than it actually was.


Pros Jacket:
- Most brands and models to choose from
- Very easy to assemble and to mount
- Very low cost models available

Cons Jacket:
- Can squeeze if fully inflated (a lot of beginners tend to put on too much weight and compensate this with the BC)
- Keeping balance/position when swimming sideways can be more difficult

Again, I agree. I think there's also a "Pro" that jacket-style BC's look like life vests, and therefore appear to be much less intimidating. Also, everything's made of plastic, rather than the scary and intimidating looking metal of a bp/wing. I believe that this "less intimidating" feature helps people to feel comfortable - a plus any time you're telling someone to breathe underwater.


Pros Back Inflated:
- Couldn't really find some which are only valid for this style
Cons Back Inflated:
- Can also give you some sort of constricting feeling if mounted wrong

A lot of people I've seen like the back inflates for exactly this reason... They're sort of a "halfway point" between jacket style BC's and a bp/wing. Some of the popular models include the Dive Rite Transpac II, the SeaQuest Balance, and the Scubapro Knighhawk. I've dived all three of those models, and they're quite nice, IMHO.

In the long run, I preferred the simplicity of the bp/wing and the stability of the hard backplate, which pretty much dissappears underwater. I also liked the fact that I could change out anything and everything; I could add and subtract D-rings, buckles, straps, mounting points, and everything in-between. I also liked the fact that it had the six pounds "built in" with the plate - a luxury that I didn't have with the back inflate.

Of course, the trim pockets took care of that, and what I gave up in modular changability I got in the fact that it was "already set up" and basically ready to go.

The only real complaint that I hear about back inflates is the fact that they tend to "push you forward" at the surface. Of course, redistributing the weight using the weight pockets can generally solve the problem.


Some questions I still have:
- Is there a difference in durability/longevity?

Like anything else you purchase, it really depends on the quality of the manufacturing. That said, the popular name brands like Scubapro, Halcyon, SeaQuest, Aqua-Lung and the like make some pretty nice stuff, especially in their higher-line equipment.

Assuming that you're asking if there's a significant difference in the longevity of the different styles of BC, I'd have to answer this way: With a backplate and wing, the metal backplate will last for many years (plastic generally has a limited life span, particularly in bright sunlight over time and in cold climates) and the entire harness is replacable for $10-$30. These are not true for a "regular" BC.

That said, most people find that most quality BC's last five years or more with regular use.


Maybe based on the materials used?

Yes.

Generally speaking, the heavier the material is, the more durability can be expected. Also, metal components will far outlast plastic ones for the reasons listed above. Metal also has the advantage of being negatively buoyant, whereas plastic is usually positively buoyant. While an individual buckle might not seem to account for much buoyancy, the culmination of all of the ones on a standard BC means that you might need to dive with another pound or two to be properly weighted. Metal fasteners, on the other hand, not only don't require you to add weight, but actually reduce the amount of weight that you need. Many people find that the net difference between the two can be three of four pounds... Which is nice to be able to take off of your belt/weight system.


Is it more difficult to get spare parts for Wing BCs? Are repairs more expensive?

No, and no. Surprisingly, it's the opposite. Since bp/wings are modular in design, parts are much easier to get and install than they are with "standard" BC's. Sure, they may have to be mail-ordered from Florida or Washington State, but they're available. Getting replacement parts for a BC from SeaQuest, Aqualung, Zeagle, and particularly Scubapro is much more difficult. Frankly, they're simply more interested in selling a new BC than helping you to fix your old one.


I've read about 'annoying and silly' crotch straps for Wing BCs. But when I look at the Dive Rite Transtec and others I cannot find them. So what's that story?

I've seen them available for the Transpac and for SeaQuest's Black Diamond, although they're usually a special-order item rather than something that's normally carried "in house" at your local dive shop.

The reality is that any BC can be used without a crotch strap, including a bp/wing. The SeaQuest Black Diamond, in particular, comes to mind as a BC that does well without a crotch strap because of the "semihard" sides of the BC which tend to keep the BC in it's proper place on your body.

The reality of crotch straps, I've found, is that they're a positive addition to a rig, particularly a bp/wing because of the fact that a bp/wing has no other way to keep itself from riding up on your torso (many other BC's have "walls" which accomplish this to some degree). However, like the metal backplate, a single crotch strap on a diver just looks uncomfortable. Many people look at them and think, "That's not something that I want." for this reason, most manufacturers have steered away from designing BC's with crotch straps.

My recommendation is to try one out for yourself. I found that some were comfortable, and some were not. Those that were comfortable were ones that I could not tell were even there at all, except that my rig stayed "down" where it was supposed to be. I found that a wider, softer strap was best for me. I chose a Halcyon crotch strap, which is made of a polymer cloth that is very soft and supple. It's 2" wide; twice as wide as the ones offered by Dive Rite and SeaQuest.

Speaking of which... These were my findings about crotch straps, in order from least comfortable to most comfortable:

1. "Standard" 2" crotch strap, made of the same webbing that is typically chosen for the rest of a bp/wing rig. I found this to basiclly "bite"" into my thick thighs, right in the sensitive areas.
2. Gary Hoadley's "soft" crotchstrap, which is a version of the same material, but has not been "stiffened." I believe that this material is actually thinner in terms of being maybe 1 mm thick instead of the 1.5 mm or so that makes up "standard" webbing. This is also 2" wide. While I found it better than a "standard" 2" strap, it still "bit" a little. My sweetheart, RavenC on this board, who's thighs aren't nearly so large has found this crotchstrap to be sufficient for her needs. However, her wetsuit now appears to be wearing a little in the crotch area due to this stiffer crotchstrap.
3. Dive Rite's 1" wide crotchstrap (also sold under some generic brand names, including one for the Black Diamond by SeaQuest). The narrower width of this strap was a positive thing for me, although the strap was more obvious to me at the surface. There was some discomfort during some of our rescue exercises, where I was being pulled around by my BC. I've heard horror stories about trying to scooter with a 1" crotchstrap.
4. My choice for crotchstraps: The Halcyon crotchstrap, which is made of a polymer material instead of regular 2" webbing. It was wide and comfortable, but never caused me any discomfort due to the wide contact area with my body and the softness of the material. The downside is that it's a $35 crotchstrap, which seemed pretty pricey for a piece of webbing.


Tell me what you think about my posting.

Jens

I pretty much agree with your impressions, and have found my impressions to be similar to yours.
 
Pio once bubbled...
Pros Wing:
- best value vs. price relation
- more flexible (get different wings with different amount of lift but keep plate; more easy to switch between 1 or 2 tanks)
- risk of squeezing your chest is very low, also for beginners
- light weighted
- more streamlined under water

Cons Wing:
- Takes more time to setup (one test mentioned a 'falling apart when tank is disassembled' effect for some models)
- Trimming/getting used to it is more difficult

Pros Jacket:
- Most brands and models to choose from
- Very easy to assemble and to mount
- Very low cost models available

Cons Jacket:
- Can squeeze if fully inflated (a lot of beginners tend to put on too much weight and compensate this with the BC)
- Keeping balance/position when swimming sideways can be more difficult

Pros Back Inflated:
- Couldn't really find some which are only valid for this style

Cons Back Inflated:
- Can also give you some sort of constricting feeling if mounted wrong
Excellent post, and very well thought out.

Now review your list of pros/cons and, for each one, ask yourself if it is or is not a factor under water. If it is a factor under water, then keep it on the list. If it is not a factor under water, then eliminate it and see how the list balances out.

A big mistake (that I made too) is to size a BC and check it for comfort based on how it feels standing upright in a dive shop... in my case, with a tank hanging off of the back.
DUHH!!! Nothing is going to be overly comfortable in that position, and relative comfort in that position means nothing when under water.

We are picking our gear to dive... not to run a marathon.
 

Back
Top Bottom