runsongas
Contributor
a hydrostatic facility conducting the visual can fail and condemn the tank during the pre hydro visual
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I see the above as a bit of a deflection from the subject in question, but you and I (doing our jobs VIP'ing cylinders) keep this issue under control enough that our sport is very lightly federally regulated.
Not sure the boom date on the ones I have seen. Not recent that's for sure.The only 72 explosive failures I am aware of took place in the 70's before yearly inspections became the norm and even then it was mostly out of the country where compressor and tank maintenance wasn't a high priority.
Its so frustrating that the ONE line that is relevant has the typo on it. My hydro shop has given me the side eye on that form in the past. I dont really care, I just fill mine anyway.Attached is the PST REE document-it may help.
The pit limits for 72s are not reduced compared to other 3AA cylinders, but the wall thickness is less.
I use a local hydro shop that will + rate Norris and PST LP72s. I sold all my Kiddie LP72s because I can't get them + rated.
The LDSs around here fill by the book and so I get 2450. That's fine. If I want to dive longer I use an HP120.