(On the other hand, if you also wanted to take a stuffed animal down for a good squeeze, it may be worthwhile. :biggrin
And why exactly would somebody want to do this? Isn't it something that 13 year old boys would want to do with their little sister's stuffed animals?
Nobody ever said you had to have a reason for everything. Some of my best culinary exploits have been the result of following random whims. The same can be said of many things. As long as you stay out of danger zones, just having fun is a great thing.
In the kitchen, you stay clear of cross-contamination, make sure you cook raw meats to prescribed temperatures, and keep things from burning. In diving, you watch your depths, times, ascent rates, buddy communication, and so on. As long as you're within the relevant envelope, what's the harm in trying even pointless things just because? It can be quite fun. (Doing a two and a half hour dive playing cards and board games on a platform 17 feet down certainly had no good reason, but take it from me, we had a blast.

)
Of course, if you simply *must* have a reason for everything, you could always use a set of photos of a progressively more crushed teddy bear to illustrate squeeze to students. They're more likely to remember a very uncomfortable teddy bear than they are to remember a bag or bucket of air. :biggrin:
On the original topic, by the way, I do have one little warning. There are two ways a sealed container (like the concept flashlight) can fail. The usual way is for water to find a way in, gradually filling the container with water. The other way is for the pressure to get greater and greater until the container catastrophically implodes (with nothing gradual about it). A light probably does not have enough air volume inside to cause a particularly bad implosion, and it's most likely to leak (by a seal or cracking the lens or what have you) instead of imploding. (One of our tech-diving instructors was talking about a dive where he came across an unbroken light bulb. He thought it was cool... until it imploded right next to his hand. Apparently, it rather stung.

) Anyway, if it does pop, don't panic. :grin:
Does it? I always thought that 3 atmospheres of pressure against a sealed body is the same whether it's water or air. If you take a non-waterproofed flashlight and throw it in a non-rigid bag, as the bag compresses, won't you be subjecting the sealed batteries and the sealed bulb to increased air pressure even if the bag is not physiclaly pressing against the hull? My bet is that you'd have an imploded bulb and more seriously, some leaky/explody batteries.
The batteries can be considered incompressible. Unless you're using a sealed lead acid battery with an enclosed gas space, there's nothing to compress. (Neither the electrodes nor the electrolytes are gases, and any evolved hydrogen or is trivial and can be ignored, assuming the cell isn't vented to make it a completely moot point.) As for the bulb, such a small, thick glass bulb should easily handle the pressure. I'll have to see if I can scrounge one up to bring down on this weekend's dives, just for an empirical anecdote.
Of course, since we're talking about an LED flashlight, there is no glass bulb anyway, and I would not want to be diving at depths that could crush a solid-state LED into oblivion.
Nonsense.
Sorry buster, the internal pressure in the bag would be the same as ambient pressure... basic Boyles Law in play. If something would crush at 10 metres outside the flexible container, it'll crush inside. Density of the gas increases in direct relationship to ambient pressure. Volume of gas showing an inverse relationship. Basic physics illustrating a basic chemical law.
There's no need to get all snippy, especially as you are an instructor talking in front of new divers. Also, you've missed my entire point. (For the record, I'm only a divemaster, but I do have a bachelor's degree in chemical engineering. By the way, Boyle's Law (and all the other special cases of the ideal gas law) are really *physical* laws, not chemical laws, but hey. Anyway, just saying that I might not *quite* be worthy of a "Sorry buster"
this time -- when I am, you are free to let me have it. :biggrin
The key is that the flashlight is not effectively sealed. If you sealed it in a tight-fitting plastic bag, it would then be effectively sealed, with the internal pressure at whatever it was when you sealed it (and the external pressure being whatever ambient is). Let's say that the pressure of 10 meters of water would crush it. Now, if you sealed it in a larger plastic bag with, say, five flashlight-volumes of air, when you get to 10 meters of water, the pressure on the outside of the flashlight would be the same as what had crushed the previous sacrificial flashlight in our thought experiment, but since the flashlight inside the bag is not effectively sealed, the pressure inside would be the very same (giving zero gauge pressure measured across the walls of the flashlight).
With the flashlight inside the bag not effectively sealed from the air in the bag, you would have to descend to such a depth as all the air in the bag had been compressed into the air space inside the flashlight. Descending an additional 10 meters would then be sufficient to crush that flashlight, as no more air would be present to migrate into the body of the flashlight to continue equalizing the pressure.