Someone in my local area was hosting a public dive event on facebook and I got a link to the event from a dive buddy and immediately recognized the cover photo advertising the event as my own. As a fairly novice UW photographer, my first reaction was "cool, they must have thought it was pretty good", but then I had what I think is the normal reaction, "but they should give me credit".
I messaged the individual (whom I've never met) and said I didn't mind him using it but asked for him to attribute credit via a link to my website.
I naively assumed that in this situation most people wouldn't have any problem providing some form of credit, but he responded pretty defensively stating he found it in "google public domain" which I'm guessing meant google image search without any copyright info and then he changed it to another photo probably from more google image searching.
For those more experience uw photogs, is this how this type of thing usually goes, people would rather not attribute credit and just use a different photo? Or does it vary pretty widely.
Anyway, a first for me, I can only imagine more prolific photogs have this happen far more.
I messaged the individual (whom I've never met) and said I didn't mind him using it but asked for him to attribute credit via a link to my website.
I naively assumed that in this situation most people wouldn't have any problem providing some form of credit, but he responded pretty defensively stating he found it in "google public domain" which I'm guessing meant google image search without any copyright info and then he changed it to another photo probably from more google image searching.
For those more experience uw photogs, is this how this type of thing usually goes, people would rather not attribute credit and just use a different photo? Or does it vary pretty widely.
Anyway, a first for me, I can only imagine more prolific photogs have this happen far more.