could not agree more how much materials make the world of difference, and little details that at the start you would never guess will make such a difference.Around 2005 when I was trying to reproduce the main diaphragm for the USD double hoses I knew that the improvements in materials would be key but since there were no actual specifications for them getting an accurate durometer reading from a 50 year old sample was near impossible so I had to guess. The first samples I had made showed no marked improvement in cracking effort over the originals. I knew something was amiss. I had the mold modified and samples were made with a thinner sidewall and the readings using those were a drastic improvement.....I should have left well enough alone but I convinced myself that if a little was good then a lot must be better and I had the sidewall made even thinner....And when I tried those I found that the cracking effort went back up. After a lot of midnight oil and trial and error I figured out that the material was so thin that there was too much stretch in the sidewall causing a lag before enough force was applied to the center disc on the lever. I proved it out a few other ways but needless to say it was an expensive experiment. Dome height, sidewall angle and durometer are a tricky business.
The Argonaut Kraken main diaphragm is actually a cross between the USD and the LaSpirotechnique designs.
Not a double hose guy, but have looked at your reg and very impressed. i get tempted to buy one, except I would have to make sure nobody knew who I was or get raked over the "how can you not dive your regs?" coals..LOL