Everybody gets focused on the deco . . . do you really need to do the deco, is your computer telling your the right amount of deco at the right depth, etc.
To me, the bottom line on this type of thing is that the deeper you go, and the longer you stay there, the more important two things become: One is that you have enough gas, both to do the dive you planned and to cope with contingencies (can you imagine how stressful it would be to have your computer telling you you need ten minutes at 10 feet, but you don't have the gas to do the time?). And the other is that you can solve problems underwater, because the surface is becoming a less and less attractive option.
Any time the surface is no longer an option (which it theoretically is not if you are under a decompression obligation) you need a much wider set of skills AND a lot more poise. You can get away with the kind of thing you did, so long as everything goes well -- but what would you have done if you had gotten a freeflow when you had your deco obligation? Do you have a plan for that?
Training for "technical", or staged decompression diving, is only in a very small part about decompression itself. We do study tables and programs and other strategies for determining profiles and planning decompression, but a lot of that is to be able to plan enough gas. Much more of the training is about staying out of trouble, and getting out of trouble, and it's involved and stress-inducing training.
So were you reckless? No, but I suspect you didn't completely grasp the implications of what you were doing. I wouldn't make a habit of it.