Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
The description from the the crew of the grape escape says the boat was fully involved, end-to-end, by the time they had been awoken by the incident vessel crew. I don’t know how long it took to get the 200 yards to the boat to raise the alarm, but the events suggest that the crew on watch had no idea it was on fire until a very large and hot fire was already burning out of control.Hey DD,
How fast do you think an accidental fire on a vessel such as Conception can spread? Too fast for a person performing an anchor watch/fire watch to alert other crew members and passengers?
This is the question that bothers me.
markm
And what do you have to compare it to - overseas liveaboards?
It sure feels that boats carrying a large # of passengers like this should be subject to more stringent requirements like SOLAS moving forward? Really sad that they appear to have been trapped in a tight space without a reasonably large and obvious secondary escape path?This vessel is not subject to SOLAS. It is a national vessel with a coastwise endorsement. SOLAS only applied to international voyages over 12 passengers.
Seems, then, like a lack of fire/smoke detection systems in order for a fire to get that large before any detection system was triggered (if it ever was)? Hopefully that will be addressed as part of the investigation.The description from the the crew of the grape escape says the boat was fully involved, end-to-end, by the time they had been awoken by the incident vessel crew. I don’t know how long it took to get the 200 yards to the boat to raise the alarm, but the events suggest that the crew on watch had no idea it was on fire until a very large and hot fire was already burning out of control.
I've seen low budget Thai boats which have better accommodations.
Who would want to be in those bottom bunks tryign to get out in an emergency/
And if that hatch in the picture was indeed the emergency escape route, well words fail me.
You'd have to be very supple to bend your way up through that bunk and out, even if it were light and you were calm. At night, in a panic somewhat unfit, older and carry a bit too much bioprene..
Even our scrappy Arabic dhows are better
Hi Loisville Diver,
Now, a vessel such as the Conception is required to have two licensed captains, one is the captain and the other is the mate.
Do you think upping that requirement to three licensed crew members is a logical next step? You would have one on duty mate or captain 24 hours per day while the vessel is u/w or has passengers aboard.
Next, should the industry require mandatory egress drills within the first six hours of departure? Including donning a type 1 PFD. Including instruction on how to use a life raft or life float? How to use an EPIRB? A discussion on fire hazards?
I am just asking as you seem to be thinking ahead in order to prevent another disaster.
To iterate, I believe the vessel did have an egress route through the shower room that led up to the foredeck. The shower room is directly ahead of the berthing compartment.
markm
I respectfully disagree. Basic safety must be strictly regulated, not governed by free market and bottom lines. Once safety standards are enforced by regulation, things like convenience, comfort, customer service, quality of food etc. could be left to markets. So yes, prices may (and likely will) increase if operators are forced to comply with stricter code, make expensive upgrades, and potentially reduce passenger capacity, but it must be driven by regulation, not by customers' stopping bargain hunting. There is nothing wrong with bargain hunting.
EDIT: thanks for posting a picture of that hatch. It reinforced my assessment that it was a grossly inadequate means of egress.