Firstly, if were truly "no-viz" what would be the point in diving?
Few recreational/open-water divers truly understand what
zero viz is like, but that issue of definition aside, if the conditions are so bad that buddy separation seems likely/foreseeable, then the dive should be cancelled on safety grounds.
Secondly, whilst you might not be familiar with cave diving, others are. Diving in the environment can entail zero visibility - and yet, buddy/team separation is still prevented. The skills, drills and procedures do exist to prevent such an occurrence, even under conditions way beyond the worst you're likely to experience in an open-water environment.
The point being: you can stay together as a pair/team, if your skills are up to it.
THIS GUY manages to stick with his buddy with zero visibility on every dive... so where's the excuse?
Diving in anticipation of buddy separation, due to sub-optimal visibility, requires a risk assessment, and some introspective honesty. If you're likely to lose your buddy, then the conditions obviously exceed your capabilities.
In recognition that you are accepting that the environmental conditions exceed your capability, where is the logic in suggesting a more advanced approach (solo diving) is the solution? You're already admitting that the dive is beyond your threshold to manage - and the solution is to dispense with your only back-up support?!?
As stated by many people, many times, solo diving is not a substitute for core diving skills, especially the application of buddy procedures. It is an advanced diving practice, that only builds upon a foundation of solid foundational skills. Such skills are woefully absent, if that diver cannot maintain cohesion with a dive buddy - a skill that can only be described as fundamentally 'entry-level'.