Effect of gas density while deep diving

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

But it's a very small population at risk:
IF you're a non-responder to elevated CO2, and
IF you're at 130', and
IF you're unexpectedly forced to exert yourself with otherwise low-resistance equipment (open circuit), then you are starting to be at risk for gas density issues.

@Kfay
And at 130ft the CO2 you retain when you work hard on OC probably isn't going to kill you. More narced yes. But if you aren't in a cave or a wreck and you're going to huff and puff and go through your limited gas supply faster trying to blow off the Co2 which most of the time is just going to cut your dive short before you go up.

In a cave or wreck, your minor Co2 hit, compounded narcosis from the Co2, and decreasing gas supply is going to be a problem quick. Which is why "deep air" has been a known risk factor in cave diving fatalities since Exley first published a "Blueprint for Survival" way back in 1979.
https://nsscds.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Blueprint-for-Survival.pdf
 
I'm having a hard time imagining anyone doing a retrospective analysis of OC diver's gas density similar to what Anthony and Mitchell published in 2015.
The pool of dives is immense and the outcomes are not as clear.

I agree that it would be hard to pull together a retrospective analysis and that's not really what I had in mind. The data they reference on pp. 72-73 of their paper from "QinetiQ" was from lab test dives and seems to have been much of the foundation for the 5.2/6.2g/L recommendation. If I'm reading it correctly, the data shown in this paper, and on the bar chart, is for rebreather dives only, but there is similar data for OC dives that is "nearly identical." I'm intrigued because I would think that while the effect might be identical, the inflection point might be different.

Obviously, probably not of interest/money for a big study of deep OC Trimix gas density effects, but perhaps there is more data to be mined from existing sources. My only point is that I wouldn't be surprised if the density recommendations were slightly different for OC.
 
@Kfay
And at 130ft the CO2 you retain when you work hard on OC probably isn't going to kill you. More narced yes. But if you aren't in a cave or a wreck and you're going to huff and puff and go through your limited gas supply faster trying to blow off the Co2 which most of the time is just going to cut your dive short before you go up.

In a cave or wreck, your minor Co2 hit, compounded narcosis from the Co2, and decreasing gas supply is going to be a problem quick. Which is why "deep air" has been a known risk factor in cave diving fatalities since Exley first published a "Blueprint for Survival" way back in 1979.
https://nsscds.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Blueprint-for-Survival.pdf

Thanks for posting the link.
Heard about it.
Well worth the read.
 
Are you really talking about breathing gas density for non professional divers???
Also about "feeling" of gas density near 40m (120ft) depths???
Please, read this Forgotten experiment "Neon 400" Here really was a problems.
And forget about "problems" with gas density for others, than commercial deep divers..
:)
 
Are you really talking about breathing gas density for non professional divers???
Also about "feeling" of gas density near 40m (120ft) depths???
Please, read this Forgotten experiment "Neon 400" Here really was a problems.
And forget about "problems" with gas density for others, than commercial deep divers..
:)
Please don’t espouse such unsafe nonsense. Gas density is a HUGE concern in deeper than recreational depths on both OC and CCR.
 
In compare of 40 atm test with Neon (ρ=0.9) and use of Helium for standard mixes (ρ=0.17) - it is nothing :) (please, see smile at the end of my message)
Neon has weight of 36 g/l at 400m.
Helium has 6.8 g/l at 40m.
Five time bigger. And "human rabbits" has staying alive at the end.

P.S. Overbalanced Aqualung Legend (and Apeks then) was developed exactly to help with bigger gas mix density.
 

Back
Top Bottom