- Messages
- 868
- Reaction score
- 2,494
If that’s is true, were his dive weights still on / off him, when his dive buddy found him?
Depending on tank configurations, cave divers rarely use any weights.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
If that’s is true, were his dive weights still on / off him, when his dive buddy found him?
That’s a level of detail I don’t have.If that’s is true, were his dive weights still on / off him, when his dive buddy found him?
What scenarios would an experienced cave diver be in an uncontrolled ascent situation and how to avoid / arrest / control it?
I am not at all a technical diver. But so much of diving is dependent on mindset whether it's rec or tech and everything in-between. I cringe when people tell me they're making the "easy" rec dive. The underlying implication is that it's so not-challenging, nothing can go wrong. I cringe even more when I hear a phrase like "simple technical". To my way of thinking, that's an oxymoron that's inviting trouble. A technical dive requires attention to detail and discipline that should take "simple" out of the equation. (And yes, I understand it's a relative term.) A tech dive by definition probably has less margin-of-error and perhaps greater penalty/consequences when things go south. To throw "simple" into the mix to my way of thinking is at least a pink, if not red, flag."This was a fairly simple technical dive within his capacity. Something just went wrong."
I understand your point, Ken, but I think people use that term when talking about a place like Eagles Nest because that site has the potential to be extraordinarily difficult and dangerous. The immediate assumption when hearing about the site is that it did involve such an activity. I am a certified cave diver and trimix instructor, but the two divers who died there last year were doing something I would not even consider doing--it was far beyond my experience and training. On the other hand, at the same site, you can do a dive that would be within the training and experience of any certified cave diver. I believe the writer's purpose was to make that distinction. It would like discussing a fatality on Everest--it makes a difference whether it was the final ascent on a new route or a hike at the base camp.I am not at all a technical diver. But so much of diving is dependent on mindset whether it's rec or tech and everything in-between. I cringe when people tell me they're making the "easy" rec dive. The underlying implication is that it's so not-challenging, nothing can go wrong. I cringe even more when I hear a phrase like "simple technical". To my way of thinking, that's an oxymoron that's inviting trouble. A technical dive requires attention to detail and discipline that should take "simple" out of the equation. (And yes, I understand it's a relative term.) A tech dive by definition probably has less margin-of-error and perhaps greater penalty/consequences when things go south. To throw "simple" into the mix to my way of thinking is at least a pink, if not red, flag.
Siltout, loss of awareness of vertical movement, up up and away.
I’m not convinced the team was “experienced” either. Seems like at best their certifications to even be at eagles nest are in question.
From what I understand, buoyancy control is one of the most important aspect of cave diving to avoid touching the ceiling / bottom & causing siltout. So, to be in a situation where a diver loss of awareness of vertical movement faster than the safe ascent rate and made the diver passed out due to AGE seems unlikely.