Doesn’t work that way.I'd want one per tank.
It’s becoming more common to have a transmitter on right tank with SPG on left tank (standard place for SPG on manifolded doubles).
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Doesn’t work that way.I'd want one per tank.
Doesn’t work that way.
It’s becoming more common to have a transmitter on right tank with SPG on left tank (standard place for SPG on manifolded doubles).
Why? At the beginning of kitting up, you check your manifold and valves are open. Once you enter the cave, you check again that everything is open. If you hit something, you do a valve check to check that everything is open and that you do not have a roll-off.I'd want one per tank.
You don't want one SPG per tank for doubles with an isolation manifold. A single SPG on the left post is sufficient. Adding another on the right post doesn't tell you anything useful, adds a failure point, and complicates hose routing. As long as the left and isolator valves are open, the single SPG tells you the pressure in both tanks. If there is any sort of failure which forces you to close a valve then the dive is over anyway so you will make an immediate safe ascent to the surface (including any mandatory deco). Since we do gas planning before entering the water we know we have enough extra gas in the team to get out even if one diver had a complete loss of back gas. No need to worry about pressure in the right tank.I'd want one per tank.
We’re getting off topic, but just abandoning viable gas and sharing air is needlessly putting all your eggs into one basket. Same with abandoning working scooters or not taking a moment to fix a scooter.Less is more.
Rich Courtney once asked me a question while filling my tanks at Cave Excursions East in High Springs. "Why do we even bother to shut down a leaking post?" What he meant by that was if we've planned correctly, the moment there is any problem with gas we should just be able to signal OOG and head toward the door.
We tend to overthink problem-solving in technical and cave diving. Another cave instructor and I became lost on a line in Manatee when my scooter quit. We were both trying to figure out the issue and referencing the guideline when we found ourselves getting the scooter going. We decided to continue the dive but we came to the end of the guideline. We somehow managed to get in a side tunnel. I started to lead out, but we never speed-matched the DPVs. I left him in the dust. I also spotted the outbound mainline and made a visual jump to it. Now, we not only had team breakdown, but we were on different lines out of sight of one another (and what if I was wrong about the line being the main exit out?). I waited for my buddy and saw him deploy his spool to do a lost line or lost buddy search. I signaled to him, but he didn't see my light. I fetched him and we exited. Eventually, we figured out we were sucked into the Milk Tunnel (siphon), that we forgot to match speed, and that it's too tempting to use a DPV to make visual jumps.
What was our goal when my SUEX XK1 quit? To go home. Why did we mess around with it and waste time? We should have just rigged for a single DPV towing a broken DPV exit and left. We would have had all day to fix it on the surface. Same with gas. As Rich Courtney pointed out, we should just get to the door and not waste time trying to solve manifold issues when we are most likely going to thumb a dive even after we get it sorted.
I'm not saying this is the solution. It is a possible solution. It's definitely a campfire or fill shed chat, but Rich had a good point to consider about just going home since we have the gas. And, the less time we waste, the more gas we have to get us home.