I have read a few old threads discussing the use of the drysuit vs. BC for buoyancy control. Opinions were pretty well split.
FOR THE PEOPLE THAT PREFER TO USE THEIR DRYSUIT FOR BUOYANCY CONTROL, I would like to ask "why carry a wing at all?"
I don't own a drysuit yet, although I have taken an introductory drysuit class. The instructor insisted that I use the suit rather than the BC for buoyancy control. I hardly mastered drysuit buoyancy, but between my instruction and the opinions of numerous board members it can be done.
In the spirit of minimalism I like to leave unnecessary gear on shore. I would think a backplate and hog harness with no wing would be a nice trim package and offset somewhat the extra drag caused by the drysuit.
Thoughts?
FOR THE PEOPLE THAT PREFER TO USE THEIR DRYSUIT FOR BUOYANCY CONTROL, I would like to ask "why carry a wing at all?"
I don't own a drysuit yet, although I have taken an introductory drysuit class. The instructor insisted that I use the suit rather than the BC for buoyancy control. I hardly mastered drysuit buoyancy, but between my instruction and the opinions of numerous board members it can be done.
In the spirit of minimalism I like to leave unnecessary gear on shore. I would think a backplate and hog harness with no wing would be a nice trim package and offset somewhat the extra drag caused by the drysuit.
Thoughts?