lamont:Anyway, this is what I was meant by semi-orthogonal
Dang. No differential equation...I feel cheated.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
lamont:Anyway, this is what I was meant by semi-orthogonal
Isn't that the answer right there then? If a non-smoker 'moves' more air than a smoker per minute then his/her SAC rate would be higher. Presumably this becomes more true in an individual person. A smoker can move 'x' units/minute, when they become a non-smoker that volume increases to 'x+y'/minute. They can simply move more air, and do, so a tank goes quicker.TSandM:If you measure the maximum amount of air you can move in and out of your lungs in one minute, that number will usually be lower for a given age and size of person in a smoker, as compared with a nonsmoker.
pilot fish:You guys do the same and see how long you can do it?
*Floater*:In a recent thread somebody posted:
"back before i quit smoking, i consistely had sacs in the .45 area
once i quit, shot up to .8 and above"
i'm wondering if there's anything to this? maybe if a large male reduces his lung capacity to that of a small female by smoking heavily, then his SCR could also fall to that of a small female as well... or is it just a relaxation thing? nicotine gum?
jtivat:Yup if it happed to them then by all means this must be true and we should all start smoking right away:shakehead
H2Andy:again... what a terrible logical fallacy this is
funny thing is, the ONLY people saying this are non-smokers