Randy43068:I know her. I'll do that tomorrow. She and I are taking DIR-F together this weekend.
Have fun, be safe and best of luck to both of you in the class! Hell, I don't know you, but tell her I said to give you a hug too
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Randy43068:I know her. I'll do that tomorrow. She and I are taking DIR-F together this weekend.
Christi:However, something no one has brought up is that if this person is a divemaster, whether he/she is a "friend" diivng with you or if he/she is diving with you as a contracted employee, he is still a diving professional and still has a significant level of implied responsibility/liability IF something were to go wrong, whether you explicity say this or not. This is why anyone who is a divemaster/instructor, whether working full-time, part-time, or not at all in that capacity needs to carry insurance. .
We're emailing as we speak.Christi:Have fun, be safe and best of luck to both of you in the class! Hell, I don't know you, but tell her I said to give you a hug too
wedivebc:I disagree. Do you know of any DM who has been held liable for something going wrong on a dive? I am talking about an actual case where the DM was required to pay.
SSSsshhhhh! You'll have the friendly tax man at your door.Randy43068:but I'd not discount the barter system, either. I trade engineering services for other "stuff" all of the time.
Christi:I cannot cite you a specific case at the moment, but I am willing to bet that there have been many cases involving a similar scenario. Whether the outcome was/is favorable to the DM is really irrelevant.
As a Dive Professional (at least as a PADI Pro) you are required to report any accidents/incidents that you are aware of and/or have witnessed/been involved in.
I am not familiar with the laws in Canada, but in the US he/she does have an implied responsibility in the event of an accident.
Again, whether the outcome is favorable for the DM or not, they will most likely be tied up in an investigation and legal proceedings for a good amount of time, especially with the itigious nature of American society.
No offense intended, but I have to admit, I am really surprised to read this comment coming from a former LDS owner. I would think risk management would be at the top of your list.
Christi:No offense intended, but I have to admit, I am really surprised to read this comment coming from a former LDS owner. I would think risk management would be at the top of your list.
wedivebc:No offence taken. Like everything in scuba diving we weigh risk against reward and make decisions accordingly. I never required my DMs to have insurance because I have never heard of any case of a DM being successfully sued. It is using the same rational that I don't have tornado insurance, now if I lived in Oklahoma...