Info Diving at Altitude

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Diving at Altitude

Diving at altitude demands adjustments to the procedures used at sea level. With moderate increases in altitude and with shallower dives, the differences can be minor, even minor enough to be ignored. As altitude and depth increase, the need for concern grows. There are three primary reasons for this.
1. In cases where the diver has ascended to altitude, the diver begins the first dive with residual nitrogen from change in altitude, so it is similar to having done a dive already.​
2. Decompression sickness depends largely upon the difference in the body’s tissue pressure upon ascent and (especially) surfacing, and that difference is potentially greater at altitude.​
3. Bubbles that are formed in the body can increase in size upon ascent, and that rate of growth needs to be controlled. The growth is greater at higher altitudes.​
Most of what we know about diving at high altitude comes from work done at what are really moderately high altitudes—usually up to 8,000 feet/2,500 meters. Little study has been done at greater altitudes than that. Most of the truly high altitude studies have been done in relation to astronauts and other high altitude pilots, and some of the scientists working on that kind of high altitude work have also been involved with decompression with diving. They caution that there is much more going on when you get to those higher altitudes, so that kind of diving should not be considered a mere extension of the norms associated with diving at more moderate altitudes.

Diving with nitrox has become increasingly popular, and many divers will not realize that altitude affects nitrox use as well. The most significant difference is in maximum operating depths (MOD), the maximum depth a specific enriched air blend can be used safely.

This article will come in Five Parts:
Part One: Starting with Residual Nitrogen​
Part Two: Tissue Pressure Gradient Upon Surfacing​
Part Three: Bubble Growth at Altitude​
Part Four: Strategies for Altitude, Including Very High Altitudes​
Part Five: Maximum Operating Depths at Altitude​
Part One: Starting with Residual Nitrogen
Beginning open water divers learn that before they begin a second dive, they must have a surface interval after the first dive. That is because when they surfaced, they still had more nitrogen in their system than normal. Because the air they breathe on the surface has a lower partial pressure of nitrogen than their body tissues, their body will slowly lose the excess nitrogen they still have in their tissues after surfacing. Unless they wait a long time, though, they will still have more nitrogen in their tissues when they start the second dive than they did for the first. That extra nitrogen, called residual nitrogen, must be accounted for in dive planning. That accounting can be done through dive tables, but today most people use computers, and the computers will factor the residual nitrogen into the following dives.

When a diver travels from low to high altitude, the diver will have residual nitrogen because of the higher partial pressure being breathed at the lower altitude, just like the higher partial pressure breathed during a previous dive. The diver must therefore plan the first dive as if it were a repetitive dive. PADI teaches divers using their tables to treat every 1,000 feet of ascent as two pressure groups, so a diver leaving sea level and traveling to an altitude of 6,000 feet would be in the L pressure group already, so an appropriate surface interval is required. With the PADI tables, a diver in the L pressure group would be back at the A pressure group in 2:10 hours, and that diver could be at a first dive level after 5:10 hours. Because the PADI tables wash out at 6 hours, divers who have been at a site for longer than that need not consider the effects of residual nitrogen. The US Navy tables and other tables that follow them wash out at 12 hours, so they require 12 hours at altitude before residual nitrogen is no longer a factor.

Of course, no one is teleported to a dive site, like crew members being beamed up to the StarShip Enterprise. A diver driving to that altitude would be off-gassing all the way up to the dive site and would arrive well on the way to first dive status. A diver flying in a commercial aircraft would be at an even higher altitude for that time, because commercial aircraft are pressurized to an altitude greater than 6,000 feet. That means that most divers will have already completed much or all of the full surface interval by the time they have set up their gear for the dive.

For divers using computers, most will adjust to altitude automatically but some will have to be adjusted manually. That computer will then know you are at altitude, but it will not know how long you have been there. In most cases, this will not matter. However, in the rare case of a diver preparing to dive with a significant load of residual nitrogen, it should be considered when deciding how close to dive to decompression limits. For technical divers diving with software generated tables, most decompression software programs will ask divers to input their current altitude, their previous altitude, and their time at the present altitude.

Because most divers will have had enough time at that higher altitude before they begin their dives to have gotten rid of most residual nitrogen even without trying to do so, this is the least important of the factors involved with altitude diving. Pressure difference upon surfacing and bubble growth are far more important factors, because they have the same impact no matter how long the diver has remained at that altitude.

Summary: Divers who arrive at altitude from a lower altitude have residual nitrogen in their tissues, as if they had already done a dive. A first dive must therefore be treated as if it were a second dive. Many and perhaps most divers, however, will be at that altitude long enough before the dive to have had enough of a surface interval to eliminate that that problem.

Continued in the next post.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would like to thank Akimbo for correcting the obvious errors that had made me cringe. I am sure there are more scattered throughout the article, but I will just beg forgiveness for those.
 
There is some information published by the Bolivian military and the Indian military diving at high elevations in the Andes and Himalayan mountain ranges. I found the articles through my university library. They were interesting to read.
 
There is some information published by the Bolivian military and the Indian military diving at high elevations in the Andes and Himalayan mountain ranges. I found the articles through my university library. They were interesting to read.
I would be interested in seeing them.
 
@boulderjohn

Can you tell us about the history of the research on diving at altitude?
I took an altitude diving course in the 1970s, and from it got the Cross Tables for altitude corrections. These were developed by E.R. Cross. I put them into this format, and used them for years. I'll try finding my information on that course, but below are the tables I used. I believe that course was held at Lake Tahoe.

SeaRat
 

Attachments

  • Altitude Corrections001.jpg
    Altitude Corrections001.jpg
    106.6 KB · Views: 104
I took an altitude diving course in the 1970s, and from it got the Cross Tables for altitude corrections. These were developed by E.R. Cross. I put them into this format, and used them for years. I'll try finding my information on that course, but below are the tables I used. I believe that course was held at Lake Tahoe.

SeaRat
Theoretical depth tables like this one are not hard to find, and I assume they are used in all recreational level altitude diving classes today.

What I have noticed at all levels of diving, including technical diving, is that people who know about these tables don't understand why they exist. When I was a student in an agency that said that divers do not need to adjust for altitude, when I argued that they did, even my fellow students who were in science fields argued that there was nothing to be concerned about, since at any depth, ambient pressure at altitude is less than at sea level, so therefore diving at altitude is safer.

These people did not understand that the key factor was not the pressure at any one depth, it was the gradient between the pressure at depth and the pressure at the surface that mattered, and since water weighs the same at altitude as at sea level but the air pressure is less, that gradient is greater at altitude. That is the gradient that gets you into DCS trouble, and that is why theoretical tables like this one were created.
 
Boulder John
That's for your article. I'll LL print it and teach from it to my young son's. Makes it understandable. We just dove 2 months ago at 9140 ft. Spent the night before diving the next afternoon. Manual dive plan minus 10 percent buffer, Max depth 40 ft and 3 hrs between dives. Departed back down to 5000 ft within 3 hrs.had a great time. Your explanations will help them understand the why's in the plans.
 
Boulder John and Akimbo,

I have all my notes from the NAUI High Altitude Diving Conference in the fall of 1974. I am going to put them into PDF format and post them here. I was sent to this conference by the U.S. Air Force, as at that time I was an USAF Pararescueman, and we had the potential of diving anywhere in the world, at sea level or altitude, for our rescue missions.

And yes, the gradient of pressures is what matters at altitude. By the way, this also pertains to flying after diving too in unpressurized aircraft (like the helicopters we crewed).

John
 
I'm going to start this by saying that these are vintage documents, dating from 1974. The first is an article by E.R. Cross, published in Skin Diver Magazine under the heading of "Technifacts." This article, "High Altitude Decompression," by E.R. Cross, was published in the November 1970 issue of Skin Diver Magazine. It is followed by asheet by Jon Pegg, M.D. dated May 1965 titled "Decompression Considerations for Diving at Altitude in Fresh Water." Both of these are presented, not as "state of the art," but as historical documents that date back over 50 years. These publications came from the NAUI High Altitude Conference in 1974.

SeaRat
 

Attachments

  • ER Cross, Altitude 001.pdf
    2.2 MB · Views: 127
I'm going to start this by saying that these are vintage documents, dating from 1974. The first is an article by E.R. Cross, published in Skin Diver Magazine under the heading of "Technifacts." This article, "High Altitude Decompression," by E.R. Cross, was published in the November 1970 issue of Skin Diver Magazine. It is followed by asheet by Jon Pegg, M.D. dated May 1965 titled "Decompression Considerations for Diving at Altitude in Fresh Water." Both of these are presented, not as "state of the art," but as historical documents that date back over 50 years. These publications came from the NAUI High Altitude Conference in 1974.

SeaRat
Thanks! I enjoyed looking at those from an historical perspective, but nothing in them has really changed much in the ensuing half century. Of course, the biggest changes are in the tables they reference and the fact that most people use computers today.
 

Back
Top Bottom