mjcoussens:Upon further thinking, it looks to me like it may be quite possible if we treat our dives as if they were being done at altitude. For example, if the top of the road is at 4000 ft. We would just plan our depths as being deeper than they actually are in regards to nitrogen absorbtion. This would make a 90 ft dive at 4000 ft elevation equal to a 104 ft dive at sea level. Right? Also, isn't it only a problem with regards to traveling higher than 6000 ft anyway?
FWIW, I'm basing this off of these links:
The Ten Foot Stop
Altitude Dive Table
Thanks,
Matt
Actually Matt no. The altitude tables assume that you've been at a certain altitude long enough to become in equilibrium and that you have a nitrogen loading OF THAT ALTITUDE prior to the dive. The article does not take into consideration (that I can see) that the base nitrogen loading at sea level is not the same as the base nitrogen loading at altitude. For example, if you plan on driving to 5000' - and you plan the dive for 5000' (even though it's a sea level dive) then you discount the fact that you are NOT starting at a pressure of .850 bar but at 1 bar - which is an 18% difference. It's the same as planning a recreational dive where you plan to emerge at the surface - but you start your dive from a submerged room where you've spent the past few days absorbing nitrogen. The reality is that this is a minor difference - but it can make the difference in saturating a tissue group that you would assume is not a problem. I've read articles before that mention this problem - driving to a higher altitude and then diving there without acclimating first.
Mark