pilot fish
Guest
- Messages
- 11,538
- Reaction score
- 6
- # of dives
- 200 - 499
Santa:It's a load off my back you should say so.
Like the shop I work for they were PADI, and my immediate feeling was they sorta deserved some kind of reporting - mainly to prevent future accidents.
However, from what I've heard, since they mainly played a role as boatsmen whereas the divers had bought the trip and subsequent dives from us it may not legally be a "padi problem" which leaves us some sort of police report, I guess.
The operation did brief us to the divesite at my request - but the legal responsibility in terms of liability releases and all that remained with us - or so I've been led to believe??
An interesting point, regarding diving as a profession, is that a one of that guys I was working with was reluctant to report out of fear of being branded a "flamer" for telling. How often does fear of winding up out of work indfluence reporting ...
Kullen by the way is no more remote a location to copenhagen than your average boat site divesites - thirty minutes to an hour, weather permitting. THe Local harbour is even closer - success and affordability comes down to the capacity of the boat and the duration of stay ...
Yours
Santa
Main thing here, I think, is to prevent future accidents, if you can. If they are ONLY functioning as boat operators, that needs to be made clear BEFORE, when booking, certainly by departure time. It seems, from your account, they even failed in that capacity.
I wasn't so much talking about a remote site but dive ops that do not do a lot of business, which would mean limited skill level of DM's, staff etc.