Pretty judgmental there, Mike.
My ex used to disappear on me in a heartbeat. He's supposed to be following me, I turn around to check, and he's gone.
So, Where's my buddy? I don't know. According to you, it's my fault the ex didn't follow the dive plan. Really? :scorned:
I agree with Basking Ridge.
Why would you say it's your fault? Your dive buddy is at fault. I wouldn't dive with that person, you didn't have a dive buddy, you just had somebody who happened to enter and exit the water and kind of dived around you sometimes. It's not your fault your dive buddy sucked, but it is your fault if you relied on that person for your safety. Since he's your ex he probably had more faults than just his poor diving skills and lack of concern for your safety.
It's not judgmental, it's simply the truth. It becomes shocking or judgmental to those of us who simply are so accepting of buddies who lack the most basic skills and cognitive recognition of having some responsibility to the other person who's counting on them in a dive emergency. You and others have grown so accepting of this lack of basic dive safety that someone who calls out what is so obviously wrong is labelled judgmental.
The truth is - that the survivor has no idea what happened to their buddy, that's not judgmental, that is the truth. They have no idea because they abandoned their buddy at the surface. It's the 'same crap, different day' nothing more. The sooner people stop calling this judgmental and start agreeing to be safer dive partners the less of these threads there will be. If people want to dive as solo divers, then get the training and equipment.
---------- Post added January 26th, 2014 at 05:16 PM ----------
Diving is a sport of personal responsibility. Risks can be mitigated but they cannot be eliminated. To imply that his dive buddy (wife) may be responsible for his death without any evidence? Where does anyone get off? People have heart attacks. They have strokes. They get attacked by sharks and hit by boats. Assuming that every person in every situation could be saved by correct "buddy action" is (IMO) ridiculous.
Re read what I said, cause I said it very carefully.
I said the survivor is responsible for the victims DISAPPEARANCE, not death.
"Surviving diver, what happened to your diver you were diving with, where are they?"
Survivor - "I don't know, we came to the surface, I swam toward the boat, I swam away from my buddy, never looked back, totally ignoring him and paying no attention to him, and did not stay near him during the swim, he disappeared, I don't know what happened to him."
This is also what I wrote --
Now whether the other diver could be alive right now, nobody will ever know cause nobody knows what happened cause the buddy abandoned the victim and has no information of what happened. Maybe there was no saving the victim, maybe all it would have taken is a simple "hey, are you okay?" and a grab of the victim as the victim's head went under, a rescue swim back to the boat with the victim, dropping their weights or filling a panic diver's BCD for them? Who knows? We could ask the buddy, but they have no answers cause they swam away.