Oyster Diver
Contributor
I think he's quilty, but I'd want more before I was willing to risk bringing him to trial.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
If he's read this thread, I'm sure the computer he was diving that day has had a catastrophic failure by now.
And someone should explain to the law....ELECTRONIC devices of any kind...just will NOT power up "at all" if the batteries are backwards. Same as no batteries at all. And they sure as hell, won't beep at you with no power to do so.....Pathetic.
Someone pointed out that if the battery in the sender unit was backwards, the wrist computer would've beeped that it wasn't getting air pressure. So, that part of the event just my be the last, and only, true part of the tale. Provided he was using a AI wireless computer, which no one here has posted what computer he was using. Which led to the theory that he's destroyed the computer if the Aussies didn't keep it.
Someone pointed out that if the battery in the sender unit was backwards, the wrist computer would've beeped that it wasn't getting air pressure. So, that part of the event just my be the last, and only, true part of the tale. Provided he was using a AI wireless computer, which no one here has posted what computer he was using. Which led to the theory that he's destroyed the computer if the Aussies didn't keep it.
My guess is the Aussies are holding the computer since the investigation still appears to be ongoing. It would be quite foolish to take a very damning piece of evidence and give it back to the suspect for safe keeping!