Hank49
Contributor
A horrible way to die. RIP
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
It seems to me (I may be wrong) that too often wreck diving is thrill seeking. If it's an easy thrill -- well established routes known to be safe -- okay. But this one...man, this one is tough for me to rationalize.
Correct. "Very little" in that sentence pretty much means "none whatsoever." I once had a very simple, one line OW entanglement a few feet from the surface where my only option was to take my gear off, go to the surface, take a breath, and untangle my gear via free diving.f this girl was alone she would have very little hope of clearing herself in some situations.
I am fascinated by old, abandoned places, in a way that I find difficult to articulate - so I see the attraction of wrecks, tunnels, bunkers, old industrial sites, etc. But compartments inside wrecks filled with silt and entanglements are dangerous places. The truth is, once I became a parent, I stopped doing certain activities ...This report kind of skizzed me out. There are all kinds of dive activities I find interesting, and worth some measure of risk, but others, not so much. This is a serious question that I'd like some informed wreck divers to answer: what's the point? I mean, I understand the point if it's a newly discovered wreck of some historical importance and the penetrations are done carefully, by experienced teams, with mechanical equipment available to help in rescues if necessary. But a 70s fishing boat? It seems to me (I may be wrong) that too often wreck diving is thrill seeking. If it's an easy thrill -- well established routes known to be safe -- okay. But this one...man, this one is tough for me to rationalize. It's like one of those 300-foot bounce dives to prove you did it, where the two outcomes are (a) you did it but nobody cares, and (b) death. I mean, WTF?
This is an important distinction. In most cases I know of around the world, the person leading the dive is called a divemaster, regardless of the actual certification level. Many people referred to as divemasters around the world are actually instructors by certification but are referred to as divemasters because that is the role they are assuming on that dive. When we refer to someone as an instructor, we are also usually referring to the role they are playing in a dive, meaning other people must be students.For example it is much more normal for an Instructor to lead group dives in Spain than may be the case in the Americas. Divemasters will probably only support instructors or lead shallow dives, so the description of the person in charge as an 'Instructor' does not suggest to me that the group were taking a course.