H2Andy
Contributor
Notso_Ken:So, who was the judgement rendered against?
The owner of the boat that did not have the required dive flag?
Or the owner of tha catamaran, who was not aware there were divers in the water due to the lack of the required dive flag?
Ken
without more information, the judgment appears to have been against the owner of the vessel that failed to fly the Alpha flag:
"Photos taken at the time of the incident showed the captain of Isham's vessel had failed to raise any dive flag, and it was also determined later that the company did not even own the large Alpha flag required by Coast Guard regulations to be displayed during diving operations."
that was the negligent action.
now, it appears that the instructor and the diver might be negligent themselves in entering the water without making sure the Alpha flag was diving. In that case, their negligence is substracted from the total award.
for example, if the jury finds they were 30% negligent and the boat onwer were 70% negligent, then they would only get 70% of the award.
it appears that the vessel that ran them over did nothing negligently. they simply were not aware that divers were in the area due to the captain's failure to fly the alpha flag.