And I teach tables and computers. I have found that if I connect the two, and students work both together, they get a much better understanding and respect for both. I also very carefully teach tables as part of my nitrogen loading section so they understand just what those pressure groups really mean to them, as opposed to being just a letter.
Redundancy, understanding, and a firm base for further learning makes me teach both tables and computers. They enjoy and understand my notrox, adv nitrox, etc... classe better if they have gotten the base to begin with. I should not have to introduce tables in the nitrox class.
Funny, SDI, who has mandated the use of computers for OW on, from 1999 has in their manual, complete sections explaining dive tables with sample problems and a copy of the Navy DiveTable in it, while other agencies who are just now espousing the use of computers, are taking them out. Interesting.
IMO, we need to understand and be able to use both, though we always have a computer.
Redundancy, understanding, and a firm base for further learning makes me teach both tables and computers. They enjoy and understand my notrox, adv nitrox, etc... classe better if they have gotten the base to begin with. I should not have to introduce tables in the nitrox class.
Funny, SDI, who has mandated the use of computers for OW on, from 1999 has in their manual, complete sections explaining dive tables with sample problems and a copy of the Navy DiveTable in it, while other agencies who are just now espousing the use of computers, are taking them out. Interesting.
IMO, we need to understand and be able to use both, though we always have a computer.