Can someone--moderator, Dr. Deco, medical person--pls clarify this important point!! It seems like there are two views:
View A--hard if not impossible to get oxygen tox from recreational depths (assuming no MOD violations), so ok to set computer to Air settings while diving EAN so long as know and follow MOD limits
View B--absolutely possible to get toxicity, so dive EAN on EAN settings but use Air tables
Which is correct? I have heard from other very experienced divers/shop owners that View B is correct and that it is dangerous to dive EAN with computer on Air settings.
Thanks.
@ReadyDiverOne , the answer is probably A, but not necessarily. And I wouldn't choose A even if it's technically correct. It's complicated, and I'll explain why. But before I do, the easiest solution is to set your computer for your mix, and then adjust your diving using your brain, rather than the toy. In other words, "sort of View B", but dive your computer set to your mix and trim your NDL rather than use Air Tables. The computer is just an estimate anyway, and acute cumulative ox tox is such a rare event (as opposed to a seizure from violating your MOD) that the best way to proceed is to collect the data using your best tools, and adjust your dive. For example, take a 4 hour break if you hit 50% O2, or always ascend to a shallower depth when your NDL reaches "X" minutes instead of 1 minute. Don't dive deep four times a day. Etc., etc.
But the reason the answer to your question is "maybe this, maybe that"
but not Air Tables, lies here:
Here's a dive profile for the Hilma Hooker in Bonaire from a few years back. 96 feet on EAN32 for 45 minutes. Wait! What? The PADI EAN32 tables limit you to 30 minutes at 100 feet. And Air Tables only allow you 20 minutes at 100 feet (rounding up, as we were taught).
Well, computers were an improvement over tables because we don't dive square profiles. If you dive using Air Tables for your NDL, you will
really shorten your dive. It's way more conservative than necessary.
As you can see in this dive, the average depth was only 53.6 feet. That's why the computer gave us such a long NDL. And after 45 minutes, the ending O2% was only 9%, for the same reason. The actual integral sum of ppO2 was lower than the tables would suggest from the maximum depth.
@Marie13 that's why using the O2 tables will really crimp your style - they assume a square profile dive. Using tables to compute O2 toxicity will give you scary numbers that just aren't true, because your average depth was (probably) much less than your maximum depth. Why not just set your gas mix and come out with better numbers to ponder?
So probably, for the average recreational diver even doing multiple dives over multiple days on EANx, you don't have to worry about your O2%. Probably. It's been commented on above with numbers from a rebreather and predictions from Multi-Deco. Getting to 100% on Nitrox is hard to do! So setting your computer on Air to make it "more conservative" makes some sense. That way (the thinking goes), "I can dive to the [shorter Air NDL] limits and
still have a margin of safety". BUT...
If you ask me (diving doc, former USAF Hyperbaric doc, scuba instructor, old guy), the method of setting your computer on air to give you a safety margin (by shortening NDL)
increases your risk. Why? Because set on Air, your computer won't beep for an MOD violation. And following a pretty fish down to a ppO2 of 2.0 because you forgot you were on EAN40 may have immediate and fatal consequences. If you want a margin of safety, make your own rules and stick to them. Hey, even after 30 years of diving, it could still happen to me. How do I know? Because I was on EAN32 in Grand Cayman just a few months ago diving Magic Mountain. This huge rock mushroom comes out of the blue topping at maybe 60 feet, but has beautiful vertical walls going straight down to well past 250 feet. It's awesome!
So I'm head down, mesmerized by the walls, just following it down. The DM says the limit for the dive was 100 feet. Blah, blah, blah, I'm just looking around. Visibility is 120 feet! Except, per habit, I glance down at my Perdix again (which doesn't beep, but WAS set for the correct gas), and the MOD flag has turned yellow! I'm at 110' and heading downward, and that's a ppO2 of 1.39. Oops! It can happen to
anybody. If my computer had been set to Air, there would have been no reminder of an impending MOD violation. I'd completely forgotten about it amidst the beauty.
Can you accumulate more than 100% O2 (or 100% CNS, or whatever your computer signals) using repetitive dives, EAN, deep depths and long dive times? It's possible, but still hard to do. As I've just suggested, the real problem is MOD. Set your computer for your mix. Period.
NOTE: Since this is the Basic Forum, I'm presuming we have some Open Water divers not yet Nitrox certified lurking in this thread. The short version of this issue revolves around the benefits versus the risks of Nitrox.
Nitrox lets you dive LONGER (with a big tank) because you accumulate less nitrogen at depth.
Nitrox does NOT let you dive deeper, because the increasing number of molecules per unit volume under pressure at depth creates a situation in which oxygen becomes toxic to the brain. The Nitrox depth limit for recreational scuba (which has a huge built-in pad for safety, naturally) is called the MOD, or Maximum Operating Depth, and varies inversely with how much oxygen is in your mixture: 32%, 36% or custom mixes from 22% to 40% for recreational diving.
Nitrox is a great way to give you longer dives, a little extra safety, or a little of both, at the cost of strict attention to MOD.
Go get your EAN card! Some home study and a one or two night class is common nowadays, and you don't even have to do a class dive with it! It's a great addition to your diving skill set.