2airishuman
Contributor
In a thread where I had posted a review of a dive op, a former employee posted a follow-up stating that he had worked there as a DM and was not satisfied with the pay, and was displeased with various other aspects of the work relationship. (For anyone new to the sport, divemasters, or DMs, are people who assist divers with gear and entry/exit, or serve as in-water guides)
Working as a DM pays notoriously poorly. People do it because they enjoy it, or because they get free air or free dives or other perks, or because they need the experience in order to become instructors.
I offer these questions for discussion:
1) Are there ANY operators who offer good wages and working conditions to their DMs?
2) Should paying customers avoid operators who do not pay a living wage? How are customers supposed to be able to tell?
3) Is the practice of tipping $10 a tank or so sufficient to make up for the poor wages?
4) Are we better off without DMs?
5) Is it fair to the operators to allow their ex-DMs to criticize their employment practices in reviews on scubaboard and elsewhere, particularly since the whole industry has a problem?
6) Are the certification agencies making it worse by insisting on an instructor development process that includes a de-facto unpaid apprenticeship period as a DM? How should that change?
Working as a DM pays notoriously poorly. People do it because they enjoy it, or because they get free air or free dives or other perks, or because they need the experience in order to become instructors.
I offer these questions for discussion:
1) Are there ANY operators who offer good wages and working conditions to their DMs?
2) Should paying customers avoid operators who do not pay a living wage? How are customers supposed to be able to tell?
3) Is the practice of tipping $10 a tank or so sufficient to make up for the poor wages?
4) Are we better off without DMs?
5) Is it fair to the operators to allow their ex-DMs to criticize their employment practices in reviews on scubaboard and elsewhere, particularly since the whole industry has a problem?
6) Are the certification agencies making it worse by insisting on an instructor development process that includes a de-facto unpaid apprenticeship period as a DM? How should that change?