I’m not even sure it’s appropriate for young athletes. Rate of sudden cardiac death during sports is still exceedingly low. How many exams would need to be performed to prevent one death? Tens of thousands? Hundreds of thousands?
I’m not an expert in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy to know to what degree it contributes to this phenomena. Is there a 1:1 correlation between exam findings and impending cardiac demise (I’m guessing not). Since there likely isn’t, what is the next step? Is there additional testing to further delineate who is at risk vs who isn’t? How many folks must undergo further screening after the first screening to see who is absolutely at risk?
No, some with HCM get cleared for diving and some run marathons. In earlier days it was a no for any sports, but now they look what is possible, but also look at the 'happinness' of a diver or sporter. It is now an individual thing, how bad is the hcm, where exactly, etc.
I have met a woman in her 80's last year in Indonesia, a very avid diver. She had stage 4 cancer and was cleared to dive. The doctor had said to her: or you will die due to your age, or during diving, or you will die from cancer. Take the time you have and do as much as you like.
The problem with some doctors is that they stick with strict rules, for example bmi over 25 or 30, is unfit to dive and they don't look further. Or 1 time a problem under water with panic=never diving again as panic can happen again. I know these examples. Other doctors are more human and say: maybe there is a very small risk, but that risk is also there at home sleeping in bed, so you can go.
Remember being healthy is not that black-white. There is physical part, but also a psycological part.
It is easy to say: search another hobby, but it is not that easy for the person.
Some get depressed and won't accept such 'advices'.
And a risk to die is not for everybody the same risk, it is also a question, do you want to take the small risk? And there are enough examples of people who ignored advices and did not got any problem. I know examples of people who got a pfo closed and did not want to wait 3 months, getting a stent and did not want to wait a year and nothing happened. You can be on the safe side but still people die, you can be on a less safe side and nothing happens.
Simply you don't know everything and it is impossible to know the future. Even not if you do for 1000's of euros on testing. You will find in everybody something then. But is it a real risk?
The no no no list is a guideline, help some beginners in diving, and it works for divecenters. As diving was that dangerous, more people would die.
And for those we a pro medicals, what if a buddy comes and has a limit on their medical such like no longer than 60 minutes, no deco, and no deeper than 30 meters? You know that the diver has some limitations. Would you accept this diver as your buddy on a dive that goes to 29.5 meter? What if you go to 30.5 then? What if you have a problem with your bcd and you go down due some stress to 35 to solve the problem? Do you want this buddy to help you or not? And what is deco? Tables give you from 15 to 20 minutes most times at 30m on air as ndl. Is a safetystop of 3 minutes too long if the dive will be then 63 minutes, so ignore the safetystop?
Would you accept a buddy over 75 that has a medical without limitations? As you know that older people are closer to their date of death and need some help to get out and in the boat becasue they are less strong or stiffer?
But the biggest risk to die is the way by car to the divesite. More than the diving itself.