It isn't libel if it's true. I'm not saying it it true or untrue in this case. I'm just saying that legally, libel isn't something written that's denigrating, it has to actually be untrue.
It's only true if a court says it's true.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
It isn't libel if it's true. I'm not saying it it true or untrue in this case. I'm just saying that legally, libel isn't something written that's denigrating, it has to actually be untrue.
I respectfully disagree. Had she not hit the Divetech boat, she would have plowed through a field of about 30 cruise ship snorkelers from Cayman Diving, and surely killed several and injured many more. Would your opinion be different had that happened? What if one of your family members was one of these snorkelers?
The only reason she didn't injur or kill anyone was luck, would it be the same result if she were 40? Nowhere in the outcome, charges dropped, did it say she could not be back at the helm today. No example for anyone, insurance settled, charges dropped, your good to go. Imagine that for reckless drivers.
Bob
I agree with Tienuts. There is no way to get around the known facts. This was gross negligence. The thing speaks for itself.