Hey guys just a quick comment here..
One of the reasons I specifically avoid telling my students about specific reliance on brand names is because the concept gets lost in the equation, and then if the brand name changes, or the product changes they are left without adequate information.
The concept that is important in the instant case isn't a "CF-200" per se, it's that ANY suit that has varying buoyancy characteristics should be avoided. More often then not divers tend to believe that the suit itself is what keeps a diver warm, so they opt for ideas like a CF-200. Whereas the educated diver knows that the undergarment is what keeps the diver warm, argon notwithstanding. As such, the educated diver opts for an undergarment that will be sufficient for the environment and then opts for a shell suit. The benefit is, of course, that the buoyancy characteristics of a shell suit is the same at 10' as it is at 300'. Neoprene, and to a lesser extent, crushed neoprene suits will require added weight for your 10' stop but upon compression at depth will require less weight. That in turn means that a diver will be at depth will more weight then need be. Particularly if you are doing deeper diving, with multiple tank(s), stage or deco bottles, strong currents etc. etc. the added weight caused by the neoprene can lead to unecessary work, which can add to C02 accumulation, added narcosis and so on..
That is why we recommend the shell suit -v- the neoprene or crushed neoprene.
Hope that helps..
Regards,
Michael H. Kane