DIN vs YOKE (USA)?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

DIN does not have the entanglement hazard that a yoke knob presents. And DIN does not have a built in lever (the knob) that could sustain an impact and provide a bending moment to the assembly as does yoke. DIN has a captured O-ring to make the seal whereas the yoke interface is not fully captured (IMO) and can thus extrude if given a chance (asymmetric loading or damage of the sealing interface). DIN is also lighter and more compact and thus advantageous for travel (advantage eliminated by carrying an adapter).

Modern yoke assemblies have been engineered to deal with asymmetric loads by being substantially oversized compared to legacy yoke assemblies and are rated to the working pressures of scuba tanks. Yoke is more damage tolerant of the sealing faces and in assembly is somewhat self adjusting/centering. We have all seen divers (other divers?) whose yoke connection bubbled happily away not just for one dive but an entire trip with no further issue than the annoying stream of bubbles.

And then there is the adapters, most are not heavily built, they increase the leverage potential by pushing the first stage further from the sealing interface, they have two sealing surface, both DIN and yoke, and the knob is there to entangle and to bang into cave/wreck ceilings and become entangled in jump lines (breaking them) thus again, combining the worst of both and the good of neither.

Think about a cylinder in service at a Caribbean resort or dive shop. It gets filled often at an off site fill facility. It gets transported to the dock/boat/shop and then gets transported again into the boat or Jeep or truck or camel. Then all the reverse back to the fill facility, multiple opportunities to drop the cylinder or impact the valve. Almost all tanks I have seen in rental fleets have at least some damage to the valve post. And yet a yoke can often be installed and will seal. Whereas a DIN regulator may not thread in if the broach is deformed or corroded and even if it threads in the sealing surface is not symmetric and thus no longer a fully captured O-ring with now the possibility of extrusion. Now hidden deep inside the threaded broach rather than being clearly visible that something is amiss as with a yoke. Installing a yoke on a damaged valve would not damage the yoke assembly, it just would not seal viably. Running a DIN assembly into a deformed or corroded or otherwise damaged valve could damage the regulator DIN assembly but fortunately usually is apparent such would be the case.
I was sarcastic but thanks for the summary. Shorter version — DIN is a better design for anything but banging valves around. That works for me as I prefer not to use tanks that have been abused.
 
On the recent Curacao trip one in our party had DIN and though it is entirely preventable which is understood so no point in “shoulda” posts, he gets it, fell off of the tailgate. First dive bus had plenty of provalve tanks, nice so if I ever go again I’ll probably bring a DIN first stage.

The damage was to the DIN part so that it was no longer usable and also did enough damage to the valve that he had to buy them a new one, he finished the week with my spare mk11 yoke.

I once had a yoke reg (kraken) fall off of a tailgate, serval inches further to the ground, HP 100 and stainless plate and full weights (over 30 lbs, cold water drysuit configuration) it was laying flat on the tailgate but got bumped and dove reg first to the pavement. When I got home I took it in the pool and even with the yoke being bent pretty bad it still functioned fine, so I wouldn’t claim a yoke type is less rugged.

If you travel with a place like dive bus and carry several tanks (we regularly load 15 tanks there) and you do encounter a bad oring you either change it or change tanks (carry spare orings) if you lose your DIN oring and don’t have a spare you’re done.

All systems work, if you pay attention and are prepared.
 
I have had DIN valves go out of round and become unusable simply by lying in the bed of a truck and having another tank shoved forcefully into place against it. You learn to be careful.

In every case of a valve going out of round, I have been able to fix it. You need a steel DIN plug. You screw it into place using a big wrench. Repeat that several times, and it will be ready to go.
 
My diving Roatan, Cozumel, and Indonesia everyone seems to default to yoke. DIN seems to be no big problem, but a Yoke to DIN converter will most likely be a pain in the neck (or back of the head).
 

Back
Top Bottom