Eric Sedletzky
Contributor
Are you sure that wing is a rebranded Oxycheq?I own the DGX brand BP/W setup, it was my first single tank BP/W setup. I have been extremely happy with it and I have had no issues with it. I still have it and use it occasionally to this day. It was affordable and DGX has excellent customer service. The wing is just a rebranded oxycheq wing for a fraction of the price. My wing has an oxycheq tag on it.
It’s quite possibly made by the same company that makes Oxycheq wings in the same room, and it might just be the same design/panel cut, but not necessarily a “rebranded Oxycheq” in the sense that it is indeed the same exact Oxycheq wing just with with a different patch sewn on. AFAIK Oxycheq doesn’t have a patent on that exact design so anybody can replicate it.
VDH also had a wing very similar and it was also made in California, quite possibly at the same place? I would like to know the place. I used to be a dealer for Oxycheq and Patrick mentioned his wings were made in California.
I’m also wondering about the materials, if they use the same thickness outer shell material and what the inner bladder thickness is and what it’s made out of. I know Oxycheq went to a urethane impregnated cloth-like material for their bladders since those are much more pinch flat resistant. I’ll bet DGX’s is the same. Oxycheq’s older outer shells were very thick and I didn’t like them that thick. They didn’t need to be that thick, so if DGX’s spec of the outer shell is thinner that is better.
Wings don’t need to be super thick, nobody needs to be that close to stuff to chafe them or puncture them. If somebody is that unaware of their surroundings and is constantly rubbing against sharp objects then they need to get the extreme wing. Oxycheq’s original clear urethane bladders, at least in their 40# Mach V, was way too big for the outer shell and it would fold up on itself leaving lumps and bumps on the outside. I think Oxycheq used a small doubles wing bladder or the old signature series bladder and stuffed it into the narrow Mach V wing shell save cost but it’s not optimal. It was also very thick and unruly.
I’m about due for a new wing after almost 20 years and I think I will get 30# DGX wing.