drrich2
Contributor
I think everyone makes that decision for themselves when deciding whether to dive in the ocean. We know there’s a risk of tragedy.
Richard.
Richard.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Although this is true to a certain extent, the freakish nature of this incident is a major factor in that attitude. It has certainly drawn my attention because it is so very different from what you typically read when you hear about a shark attack on a diver. Those reports are rare to begin with, but when you read the details, you usually find it as a snorkeler, not a diver, who was attacked. You then usually find other details that indicate that the supposed attack was not what the headline suggested. It most often involves a shark sprinting up from the depth, making a single bite on a swimmer on the surface, going away, and not returning. The usual assumption is mistaken identity.In other words, we take deaths from shark attacks as acceptable losses.
That's a reasonable assumption, but there are still a lot of unknowns. I was hoping the Undercurrent article would have shed some light. It seems that the DAN question should have been answered without it needing to be asked. Maybe a lot is being withheld for legal reasons. I don't know...