So do you agree than the Matthias's system coverts the analog signal from the internal flash into DIGITAL
. BEFORE sending to the optical cable? And that the Inon system sends the signal in analog form into the optical cable, arriving at the strobe head in ANALOG form, which then the strobe coverts into a digital signal?
If you agree then why did you say that both systems were in fact they both use the same principal. The Matthias's system, by converting into digital signal as soon as it leaves the internal flash head, yields a more cleaner, predictable signal as it travels through the optical cable. The Inon system on the other hand is relying on the placement of the optical cable to the IR filter so the strength of the ANALOG signal will vary on the distance or angle of the optical connection. Garbage in garbage out as it enters the strobe head. Converting into digital in the strobe will not help if the data is already bad.