We've never experienced one, and won't complain if we never do, but downwellings are like lightning --- I think you should know what to do or not do even if the odds are remote. We've all been taught since elementary school that you don't go out to the middle of a golf course or climb a tree during a lightning storm.
So, I've had it in my mind, that the first or preferred course of action would be to stabilize depth while swimming parallel to the wall and then ascend when the downwelling subsided enough to allow that. The second plan would be to swim away from the wall.
It sounds like from reading your account, that my option number one would have been an unmitigated failure.
Please comment.
It's a 50|50 split for unmitigated failure! (YMMV! Anyone with experience in multiples of these, please speak up!)
What goes down must come up - if you are in a down current then sooner or later there will be an up current. In between there may well be a cross current, because all currents are circular.
There's one problem with your set up - you are assuming you will know where the wall is. I knew, but at least 2 people on the dive didn't. So let's make this a worst case scenario and say you had no idea where the wall was.
If you headed East, towards the wall, you basically would have dived my dive.
If you headed North (roughly parallel to the wall) I think you might have gone deeper than I'd care to because stabilizing in the blue water would have been challenging but you would eventually have come to an up part of the current, which I know was North of our drop. You'd then be trading one set of problems for another, because you'd be dumping air, inverted and kicking to try to keep from rocketing to the surface.
This was (roughly) Cindy's dive - she knew where the reef was but she was helping another diver. So I think you'd have been okay.
If you headed west - away from the wall - I think you might have wound up similar to Cindy's dive, only much further out in the channel. I hypothesize this because that's more like where the DM wound up with her group. I hypothesize that down currents need large un-yielding surfaces to respond to - like walls. Sooner or later they will dissipate, given enough water to swallow them up.
If you headed South, which is parallel to the wall and so would have been one of your two planned options if you did know where the wall was? I think that might have been a Very Bad Option Indeed.
South would have you fighting the northerly current - the one we dive in all the time - plus a down current. You may have burned a couple thousand PSI going nowhere but down.
Eventually you would tire of that and go somewhere else, because you are not an idiot, so the question is how much tragedy debt would you have accrued in the meantime? Based on what we saw you could have hit 200 feet (or a lot more? Or less? Who knows?) of depth on EAN 36. Not a fantastic option.
Sorting it thru, here's my takeaway:
Plan A: If I know where the wall is, I'm heading for it no matter what. If i clearly can't make progress at all then I will go to Plan B.
Plan B: if I truly don't know where the wall is or the wall is entirely inaccessible I will concentrate on reversing my descent and kick with the current (cross preferably if available, perpendicular to the down if not) and I'll use daylight for up. In other words, I'll do plan A towards a wall that might not exist, because intention.
Treat daylight as your wall and find the best path to it.
(Edited to clarify kicking with the current.)