Heres where the white balance seems to matter: my favourite pictures of anything typically involve natural lighting. I'm not a fan of flashes at all if i can help it. The one thing i love about the 5050 is that it takes excellent pictures in low light. So, if you're using a flash for the macro or close up shots, i dont think white balance is an issue at all because you're bringing your white back to true white with the lights that you're using to illuminate the subject. I love that feeling in a picture of truly being there and remembering an area exactly as i saw it - the white balance really seemed to help on the one dive that i did to restore some balance and get rid of that pure blue washed look since i wasnt taking RAW shots and editing them later. So i guess it really wouldnt be totally necessary all the time but for those shots, it would seem to restore things temporarily. Obviously you'd need enough ambient light for that but those are some of the kinds of pics i love. As well, if you're going for the true blue of the area you saw, i would think it would be necessary there as well - a lot of my pictures in the factory setting seem to have an unnatural cyan tinge to them, so i've photoshopped them back to the way i remember them.
But like i mentioned before, those were my first sets of pictures ever so I'll be experimenting much more and finding millions of new things no doubt. I can't wait to get down again. I love that 5050 though for its ability to be close to an SLR in features so that it gives you enough room to grow.
steve
But like i mentioned before, those were my first sets of pictures ever so I'll be experimenting much more and finding millions of new things no doubt. I can't wait to get down again. I love that 5050 though for its ability to be close to an SLR in features so that it gives you enough room to grow.
steve