Creation vs. Evolution

[Bryan]

In my belief the answer is nothing. The reason being that God created the "Laws of creation."

The system that is the Universe, the living entity that is time and space. Ergo, "The Creator" created within the system, the law of for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

We have the same problem whether we believe in a Creator or not... i.e., where did the stuff that initially fueled the Big Bang come from?

 

[Soggy]

None of us was around to observe creation or evolution.

Incorrect

Transitional fossils have yet to be found.

Incorrect

If you want to know why, read the thread.

Edit:
I'll give you a jump-start:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transitional_fossils
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_transitional_fossils

I can't believe people continue to propagate the "no transitional fossils" nonsense. If you want to argue a theory, at least take some time to learn a little about it!

 

[adurso]

No human was present at the dawn of our universe to tell us what happened, objectively.

None of us was around to observe creation or evolution. Transitional fossils have yet to be found. Since science is based upon observation, this leaves a huge blindspot.

So, one really has to start with their favored presupposition and build from there.

Read through the thread, there are transitional fossils....See Lamont's posts on the origin of the universe (re: your other post about creation)

 

[adurso]

Shucks, Soggy beat me to it!

 

[Bryan]

Incorrect



Incorrect

If you want to know why, read the thread.

Despite this reply to my post, it is not possible to categorically reject these statements. At least not scientifically.

 

[sandjeep]

You think I haven't?! That's almost insulting

Not my intent to be insulting in any way. I'm sorry that you took it as such. Please accept my apology.

It just seemed to me from your post that you practice a faith based belief as well.

Good Diving

 

[adurso]

Herein lies the language problem again; without a scientific background the cogent explanations, which do indeed categorically reject your statements, fall upon misunderstanding ears.

 

[Soggy]

Despite this reply to my post, it is not possible to categorically reject these statements. At least not scientifically.

I just get a little irritated when people come out and propagate completely false nonsense.

I edited my post to nudge you in the right direction, if you are interested in actually learning about the science.

 

[H2Andy]

Really? By whose standards, yours?

by what standards do you live a moral life?

who made the decision that those were the standards you wanted to follow?

why did you decide to follow them?

ultimately, who makes the decision as to what is moral and what isn't?

(i won't spell it out; see if you can figure that one out)

i will say this: we are all doomed to choose what we think is right.

 

[Soggy]

It just seemed to me from your post that you practice a faith based belief as well.

My beliefs are based in study of ethics, observation and falsifiable scientific experimentation.